• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高剂量与低剂量双氯芬酸与心血管风险:一项模拟目标试验。

High- vs. low-dose diclofenac and cardiovascular risks: a target trial emulation.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Olof Palmes Allé 43-45, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2023 Jul 29;9(5):453-461. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad018.

DOI:10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad018
PMID:36921986
Abstract

AIMS

To examine the dose dependency of diclofenac's cardiovascular risks.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using Danish health registries and the target trial emulation design, we conducted a series of 300 nationwide cohort studies during 1996-2020, each mimicking the strict design criteria of a clinical trial. Adults eligible for inclusion had no recent non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescriptions, contraindications (gastrointestinal diseases, thrombocytopenia, or heart failure), or conditions with low adherence (dementia or psychiatric disease). Diclofenac initiators were compared to healthcare-seeking non-initiators and head-to-head using an approximated high dose of ≥150 mg/day vs. low dose of <150 mg/day. Cox regression was used to compute the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within 30 days following initiation. We adjusted for age, sex, calendar period, comorbidity, comedication, and socioeconomic position. Compared with non-initiators (n = 3 789 617), diclofenac initiators (n = 1 894 834) had an approximately 50% increased rate of MACE (IRR 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43-1.63), reflecting IRRs of 1.54 (95% CI: 1.40-1.69) for myocardial infarction, 1.29 (1.14-1.45) for ischaemic stroke, and 1.92 (1.71-2.16) for cardiac death. The risk increase was observed for most conditions with chronic pain, in particular headache (IRR 5.10, 95% CI: 1.46-17.85). The risk increase was similar for initiators of high- (IRR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.40-1.71) and low-dose diclofenac (IRR 1.52, 1.41-1.63), which was confirmed in a head-to-head analysis (IRR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.90-1.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Initiators of high- and low-dose diclofenac had comparably increased cardiovascular risks. This finding provides evidence against the assumption that low-dose diclofenac is risk-neutral.

摘要

目的

研究双氯芬酸的心血管风险与剂量的关系。

方法和结果

利用丹麦健康登记和目标试验模拟设计,我们在 1996 年至 2020 年期间进行了一系列 300 项全国性队列研究,每项研究都模拟了临床试验的严格设计标准。符合纳入标准的成年人没有最近的非甾体抗炎药处方、禁忌症(胃肠道疾病、血小板减少症或心力衰竭)或低依从性疾病(痴呆或精神疾病)。双氯芬酸的起始使用者与寻求医疗保健的非起始使用者进行了比较,并使用近似高剂量(≥150mg/天)与低剂量(<150mg/天)进行了头对头比较。使用 Cox 回归计算起始后 30 天内主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的发生率比(IRR)。我们调整了年龄、性别、日历期、合并症、合并用药和社会经济地位。与非起始使用者(n=3789617)相比,双氯芬酸起始使用者(n=1894834)的 MACE 发生率约增加 50%(IRR 1.53,95%置信区间[CI]:1.43-1.63),反映出心肌梗死的 IRR 为 1.54(95%CI:1.40-1.69),缺血性中风为 1.29(1.14-1.45),心脏性死亡为 1.92(1.71-2.16)。这种风险增加见于大多数慢性疼痛的情况下,特别是头痛(IRR 5.10,95%CI:1.46-17.85)。高剂量(IRR 1.55,95%CI:1.40-1.71)和低剂量(IRR 1.52,1.41-1.63)双氯芬酸起始使用者的风险增加相似,这在头对头分析中得到了证实(IRR 1.01,95%CI:0.90-1.12)。

结论

高剂量和低剂量双氯芬酸的起始使用者的心血管风险增加相当。这一发现否定了低剂量双氯芬酸无风险的假设。

相似文献

1
High- vs. low-dose diclofenac and cardiovascular risks: a target trial emulation.高剂量与低剂量双氯芬酸与心血管风险:一项模拟目标试验。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2023 Jul 29;9(5):453-461. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad018.
2
Diclofenac use and cardiovascular risks: series of nationwide cohort studies.双氯芬酸的使用与心血管风险:一系列全国性队列研究
BMJ. 2018 Sep 4;362:k3426. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3426.
3
Cardiovascular Risks of Diclofenac Versus Other Older COX-2 Inhibitors (Meloxicam and Etodolac) and Newer COX-2 Inhibitors (Celecoxib and Etoricoxib): A Series of Nationwide Emulated Trials.二氯芬酸与其他 older COX-2 抑制剂(美洛昔康和依托度酸)和新型 COX-2 抑制剂(塞来昔布和依托考昔)的心血管风险:一系列全国模拟试验。
Drug Saf. 2022 Sep;45(9):983-994. doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01211-1. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
4
Impact of Lifestyle and Socioeconomic Position on the Association Between Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Use and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A Case-Crossover Study.生活方式和社会经济地位对非甾体抗炎药使用与主要不良心血管事件之间关联的影响:病例交叉研究。
Drug Saf. 2023 Jun;46(6):533-543. doi: 10.1007/s40264-023-01298-0. Epub 2023 May 2.
5
Prescriber responsibility, predictors for initiation, and 20-year trends in use of non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with cardiovascular contraindications: a nationwide cohort study.心血管疾病禁忌患者使用非阿司匹林非甾体抗炎药的处方者责任、起始用药预测因素及20年使用趋势:一项全国性队列研究
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2021 Nov 3;7(6):496-506. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa073.
6
Coronary Risks Associated with Diclofenac and Other NSAIDs: An Update.与双氯芬酸和其他 NSAIDs 相关的冠心病风险:最新进展。
Drug Saf. 2020 Apr;43(4):301-318. doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00900-8.
7
Comparative cardiovascular safety of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with hypertension: a population-based cohort study.非甾体抗炎药在高血压患者中的心血管安全性比较:基于人群的队列研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 May;84(5):1045-1056. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13537. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
8
Are prescribers not aware of cardiovascular contraindications for diclofenac? A claims data analysis.处方医生是否不知道双氯芬酸的心血管禁忌?一项索赔数据分析。
J Intern Med. 2020 Feb;287(2):171-179. doi: 10.1111/joim.12990. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
9
Cardiovascular safety of hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin-diclofenac in the management of acute postsurgical pain: a pooled analysis of 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled phase III clinical trials.羟丙基-β-环糊精-双氯芬酸用于急性术后疼痛管理的心血管安全性:两项随机、双盲、安慰剂和活性对照药对照的III期临床试验的汇总分析
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Jun;31:249-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.01.020. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
10
Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs among healthy people and specific cerebrovascular safety.健康人群中使用非甾体抗炎药与特定的脑血管安全性
Int J Stroke. 2014 Oct;9(7):943-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00863.x. Epub 2012 Oct 23.