Institute of Hygiene, University Hospital Münster, Robert-Koch-Straße 41, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Department of Medicine A, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Mar 15;28(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01085-8.
Bacterial infections are a major complication for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Therefore, protective isolation is considered crucial to prevent nosocomial infections in this population. Here, the impact of intensified contact precautions on environmental contamination and the occurrence of bloodstream infections (BSI) in patients on a HCT unit were compared between two contact precaution measures.
A 2-year retrospective observational study was performed. In the first year, strict contact precaution measures were applied (i.e., protective isolation, the use of sterile personal protective equipment (PPE) by healthcare workers and visitors and sterilization of linen and objects that entered the patient's room). After one year, contact precautions were reduced (i.e., no use of sterile PPE, no sterilization of linen and objects that entered the patient's room). Environmental contamination in randomly selected patient rooms was monitored by sampling six standardized environmental sites in the respective patient treatment units. In a before-and-after study, the number of BSI episodes of those patients, who were accommodated in the monitored rooms was compared.
In total, 181 treatment units were monitored. No significant difference in the contamination of anterooms and patient's rooms between both groups was found. A total of 168 patients were followed for the occurrence of BSI during the entire study period (before: 84 patients, after: 84 patients). The total count of patients with BSI episodes showed a higher incidence in the period with reduced contact precautions (30/84 vs. 17/84, p = 0.039). The cause of this increasing number of BSI can be traced back to BSI episodes with common commensal bacteria (17/84 vs. 5/84, p = 0.011).
The implementation of maximal barrier measures did not reduce the bacterial contamination of the patients' environment. The impact on the patients' outcomes remain controversial. Further research is needed to investigate the impact of infection prevention measures on the clinical outcome of patients undergoing HCT.
细菌感染是异基因造血干细胞移植(HCT)患者的主要并发症。因此,为防止医院感染,保护性隔离被认为对该人群至关重要。本研究比较了两种接触预防措施对 HCT 病房患者环境污染和血流感染(BSI)发生率的影响。
进行了一项为期 2 年的回顾性观察研究。在第一年,采用严格的接触预防措施(即保护性隔离、医护人员和访客使用无菌个人防护装备(PPE)以及对进入患者房间的亚麻布和物品进行消毒)。一年后,接触预防措施减少(即不使用无菌 PPE,不消毒进入患者房间的亚麻布和物品)。通过在各患者治疗单元中随机选择患者房间,采集 6 个标准化环境部位的样本,监测环境污染。在前后研究中,比较了安置在监测房间的患者的 BSI 发作次数。
共监测了 181 个治疗单元。两组之间的前厅和患者房间的污染没有显著差异。在整个研究期间(前:84 例,后:84 例),共对 168 例患者发生 BSI 的情况进行了随访。在接触预防措施减少的时期,BSI 发作的总患者人数显示出更高的发病率(30/84 例比 17/84 例,p=0.039)。BSI 发生率增加的原因可追溯到常见共生菌引起的 BSI 发作(17/84 例比 5/84 例,p=0.011)。
实施最大屏障措施并未降低患者环境的细菌污染。其对患者结局的影响仍存在争议。需要进一步研究感染预防措施对接受 HCT 患者临床结局的影响。