• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会影响、意识或经验重要吗?——爱尔兰农业科学专业大学生对与农场相关伤害风险感知的深入理解。

Do social influences, awareness, or experience matter? Toward a better understanding of Farm-related Injury Risk Perception among agricultural science college students in Ireland.

机构信息

Teagasc - Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority, Rural Economy Development Programme, Dublin, Ireland.

Teagasc - Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority, Farm Health and Safety Knowledge Transfer Unit, Kildalton Agricultural College, Kilkenny, Ireland.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;11:1076332. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1076332. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1076332
PMID:36923033
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10009155/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Formal farm safety education/training should be tailored, in terms of the approach, content and delivery, to students undertaking agriculture education and training to enhance Farm-related Injury Risk Perception (FIRP). To this end, this paper assesses factor(s) explaining or predicting levels of FIRP amongst students studying for a degree in agriculture science.

METHODS

A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of Bachelor of Agriculture Science (BAgrSc) students ( = 417) (aged 18-20) in Ireland. Descriptive [frequency and cross-tabulations) and inferential (Ordinal Logistic Regression (OLR)] analyses were applied to evaluate the effects of social influences, experience (of farming, of a near-miss or injury), and awareness (of others who were injured or killed on the farm) on FIRP.

RESULTS

The study found that social influences negatively affected FIRP ( < 0.05). A relatively small number of students reported experiencing an injury ( = 56, 13.4%) that resulted in them being unable to participate in educational or social activities. A quarter of the respondents did, however, record experiencing a near-miss/close call ( = 106, 25.4%). A notable proportion ( = 144, 34.5%) of students had personal connections to someone who died as a consequence of a farm-related incident and 56.4% ( = 235) knew someone who was moderately or severely injured. OLR findings established that experiencing a severe injury, having a near-miss or close call, and awareness of a farm-related death or injury positively affects FIRP ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Perception of farm risks amongst students in Ireland is low. Students who recorded higher levels of risk perception were, however, more likely to report experiencing a near-miss, close call or severe injury, or knowing someone who experienced a farm-related injury or fatality. Farmers, family or friends were found to negatively impact the FIRP and this reflects previous research findings. Our findings highlight the need for education and training programs to enhance opportunities for student peer-to-peer learning through sharing of experiences and/or knowledge of farm injuries and/or fatalities. Such activities will enhance awareness and understanding amongst the general population of students leading to increased FIRP and contribute to a reduction in risk-taking.

摘要

简介

正式的农场安全教育/培训应根据学生接受农业教育和培训的方式、内容和方式进行调整,以提高与农场相关的伤害风险感知(FIRP)。为此,本文评估了影响农业科学专业学生 FIRP 水平的因素。

方法

对爱尔兰全国范围内的农业科学学士(BAgrSc)学生(n=417)进行了一项横断面在线调查(年龄 18-20 岁)。采用描述性(频率和交叉表)和推断性(有序逻辑回归(OLR))分析来评估社会影响、经验(农场、近因或受伤)和意识(他人在农场受伤或死亡)对 FIRP 的影响。

结果

研究发现,社会影响对 FIRP 有负面影响(<0.05)。只有少数学生报告说经历过受伤(n=56,13.4%),导致他们无法参加教育或社交活动。然而,四分之一的受访者(n=106,25.4%)记录了近因/险些事故。相当一部分学生(n=144,34.5%)与因农场事故而死亡的人有个人联系,56.4%(n=235)认识中度或严重受伤的人。OLR 结果表明,经历过严重伤害、近因或险些事故、以及对农场相关死亡或伤害的意识,会对 FIRP 产生积极影响(<0.05)。

结论

爱尔兰学生对农场风险的感知度较低。然而,那些报告风险感知水平较高的学生更有可能报告经历近因、险些事故或严重伤害,或认识经历过农场相关伤害或死亡的人。发现农民、家人或朋友对 FIRP 产生负面影响,这反映了先前的研究结果。我们的研究结果强调了需要开展教育和培训计划,通过分享农场伤害和/或死亡经验和/或知识,为学生之间的同伴学习提供更多机会。这些活动将提高一般学生群体的意识和理解,从而提高 FIRP,并有助于降低风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a659/10009155/a9109fec24e3/fpubh-11-1076332-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a659/10009155/9fcb64552396/fpubh-11-1076332-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a659/10009155/cbbac16a4417/fpubh-11-1076332-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a659/10009155/a9109fec24e3/fpubh-11-1076332-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a659/10009155/9fcb64552396/fpubh-11-1076332-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a659/10009155/cbbac16a4417/fpubh-11-1076332-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a659/10009155/a9109fec24e3/fpubh-11-1076332-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Do social influences, awareness, or experience matter? Toward a better understanding of Farm-related Injury Risk Perception among agricultural science college students in Ireland.社会影响、意识或经验重要吗?——爱尔兰农业科学专业大学生对与农场相关伤害风险感知的深入理解。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;11:1076332. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1076332. eCollection 2023.
2
Does farming experience matter? A comparison of farm health and safety attitudes, perceptions, and intentions of agricultural science students with and without farming experience.务农经验是否重要?有务农经验和无务农经验的农业科学专业学生的农场健康和安全态度、看法和意图比较。
Rural Remote Health. 2023 Jan;23(1):8165. doi: 10.22605/RRH8165. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
3
Farm Safety: A Study of Young Farmers' Awareness, Attitudes and Behaviors.农场安全:对年轻农民的意识、态度和行为的研究。
J Agromedicine. 2023 Jul;28(3):576-586. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2023.2180124. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
4
Weather, Workload and Money: Determining and Evaluating Sources of Stress for Farmers in Ireland.天气、工作量与金钱:确定和评估爱尔兰农民的压力来源
J Agromedicine. 2022 Apr;27(2):132-142. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2021.1988020. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
5
Telling Tales: Using Vignettes to Overcome Optimism Bias in Farm Health and Safety Attitudinal Studies.说故事:利用短篇故事克服农场健康和安全态度研究中的乐观偏见。
J Agromedicine. 2024 Oct;29(4):531-546. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2365638. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
6
Pilot Evaluation of a Co-Designed Gamified Farm Injury Prevention Educational Resource for Adolescents.青少年共创游戏化农场伤害预防教育资源的初步评估。
J Agromedicine. 2024 Oct;29(4):615-625. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2382716. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
7
Identifying Farmer Workplace Injury Risk Factors in Ireland Using Farm Accounts Data.利用农场账目数据识别爱尔兰农民工作场所伤害风险因素。
J Agromedicine. 2021 Oct;26(4):411-419. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2020.1837704. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
8
Beyond Age and Cause: A Multidimensional Characterization of Fatal Farm Injuries in Ireland.超越年龄和原因:爱尔兰致命农场伤害的多维特征分析
J Agromedicine. 2023 Apr;28(2):277-287. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2022.2116138. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
9
Ethnic and gender differences in farm tasks and safety practices among rural California farm youth.加利福尼亚农村青年在农场任务和安全实践方面的种族和性别差异。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2012;9(6):362-70. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2012.679584.
10
Agricultural Disability Awareness and Risk Education (AgDARE) for high school students.面向高中生的农业残疾认知与风险教育(AgDARE)。
Inj Prev. 2001 Sep;7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i59-63. doi: 10.1136/ip.7.suppl_1.i59.

本文引用的文献

1
Beyond Age and Cause: A Multidimensional Characterization of Fatal Farm Injuries in Ireland.超越年龄和原因:爱尔兰致命农场伤害的多维特征分析
J Agromedicine. 2023 Apr;28(2):277-287. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2022.2116138. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
2
Farm fatalities in Northern Ireland agriculture: What fifty years of data tell us.北爱尔兰农业中的农场死亡事件:五十年来的数据告诉了我们什么。
Econ Hum Biol. 2022 Aug;46:101122. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2022.101122. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
3
Farmers' Perceptions of Grain Bin Entry Hazards.农民对粮仓进入危害的认知。
J Agric Saf Health. 2022 Jan 13;28(1):19-30. doi: 10.13031/jash.14662.
4
Factors that Influence Farm Safety Decisions of Young Adults when Entering Agricultural Grain Bins.影响年轻成年人进入农业粮仓时农场安全决策的因素。
J Agric Saf Health. 2021 Jul 9;27(3):147-158. doi: 10.13031/jash.14450.
5
Intergenerational transfer of occupational risks on family farms.代际传递的职业风险在家庭农场。
J Rural Health. 2022 Jun;38(3):527-536. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12602. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
6
Watch Out for the Bull! Farmer Risk Perception and Decision-Making in Livestock Handling Scenarios.小心那头公牛!畜牧业中农民的风险认知与决策
J Agromedicine. 2022 Jul;27(3):259-271. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2021.1920528. Epub 2021 May 31.
7
A qualitative exploration of the content and face validity of preference-based measures within the context of dementia.在痴呆症背景下偏好测量的内容和表面有效性的定性探索。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jun 11;18(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01425-w.
8
Identifying "Vulnerable Agricultural Populations" at Risk for Occupational Injuries and Illnesses: A European Perspective.识别面临职业伤害和疾病风险的“脆弱农业人口”:欧洲视角。
J Agromedicine. 2021 Jul;26(3):340-345. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2020.1771498. Epub 2020 May 27.
9
Agricultural Safety Education: Formative Assessment of a Curriculum Integration Strategy.农业安全教育:课程整合策略的形成性评估
J Agric Saf Health. 2019 Feb;25(2):63-76. doi: 10.13031/jash.13113.
10
Farmer Discussion Groups Create Space for Peer Learning about Safety and Health.农民讨论小组为同行之间开展安全与健康方面的学习创造了空间。
J Agromedicine. 2021 Apr;26(2):120-131. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2020.1720882. Epub 2020 Feb 20.