• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

舒格利单抗联合化疗对比化疗治疗转移性非小细胞肺癌的成本效果分析。

Sugemalimab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and the People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;11:1054405. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1054405. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1054405
PMID:36923040
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10008846/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sugemalimab is a newly developed inhibitor of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). As a first-line treatment for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), sugemalimab plus chemotherapy (Sugema-Chemo) has been proven effective. Still, its cost-effectiveness has not yet been determined. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of Sugema-Chemo from a health care perspective in China.

METHODS

A partitioned survival model was used. According to the GEMSTONE-302 trial, the clinical characteristics and outcomes of the patients were obtained. The outcomes were costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), incremental net health benefits (INHB) and incremental net monetary benefits (INMB). The robustness of the model was further evaluated, as well as subgroup analyses. When the ICER was lower than the willingness to pay (WTP) threshold ($38,017/QALY or $86,376/QALY, defined as three times the per capita gross domestic product value of the general region and Beijing), the cost-effectiveness of Sugema-Chemo was assumed for general regions or Beijing.

RESULTS

Compared with chemotherapy alone, Sugema-Chemo resulted in an incremental gain of 0.82 QALYs, an incremental gain of 1.26 life-years, as well as an average increase cost of $72,472. The ICER was $88,744/QALY. Model outcomes were susceptible to average body weight and cost of sugemalimab. Sugema-Chemo was cost-effective at a WTP threshold of 86,376/QALY if the average body weight was <62.44 kg or if the price of sugemalimab was <$2.996/mg. As well, Sugema-Chemo was also cost-effective when the cost of sugemalimab was <$1.839/mg for a WTP threshold of $38,017/QALY. Sugema-Chemo had a probability of > 50% being considered cost-effective in most subgroups at the $86,376/QALY threshold. However, Sugema-Chemo did not achieve cost-effectiveness (0%) in any of the subgroups when WTP was set at $38,017/QALY.

CONCLUSION

Sugema-Chemo might not be cost-effective in patients with metastatic NSCLC in China. In deciding between Sugema-Chemo and chemotherapy alone, it is essential to consider both the body weight of patients and the price of sugemalimab. A price reduction of sugemalimab under the National Healthcare Security Administration may be an effective measure to improve the cost-effectiveness of the drug.

摘要

背景

舒格利单抗是一种新开发的程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)抑制剂。作为转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的一线治疗药物,舒格利单抗联合化疗(Sugema-Chemo)已被证明有效。然而,其成本效益尚未确定。本研究旨在从中国卫生保健的角度评估 Sugema-Chemo 的成本效益。

方法

采用分割生存模型。根据 GEMSTONE-302 试验,获得患者的临床特征和结局。结果为成本、质量调整生命年(QALYs)、增量成本效果比(ICER)、增量净健康收益(INHB)和增量净货币收益(INMB)。进一步评估了模型的稳健性,并进行了亚组分析。当 ICER 低于意愿支付(WTP)阈值($38,017/QALY 或$86,376/QALY,定义为一般地区和北京人均国内生产总值的三倍)时,假设 Sugema-Chemo 在一般地区或北京具有成本效益。

结果

与单独化疗相比,Sugema-Chemo 可使 QALYs 增加 0.82 个,使寿命增加 1.26 年,平均增加成本$72,472。ICER 为$88,744/QALY。模型结果易受平均体重和舒格利单抗成本的影响。如果平均体重<62.44kg 或舒格利单抗的价格<$2.996/mg,Sugema-Chemo 在 WTP 阈值为$86,376/QALY 时具有成本效益。当舒格利单抗的价格<$1.839/mg 时,Sugema-Chemo 在 WTP 阈值为$38,017/QALY 时也具有成本效益。在$86,376/QALY 的阈值下,Sugema-Chemo 在大多数亚组中具有超过 50%的可能性被认为是具有成本效益的。然而,当 WTP 设定为$38,017/QALY 时,Sugema-Chemo 在任何亚组中均不具有成本效益(0%)。

结论

在中国,转移性非小细胞肺癌患者使用 Sugema-Chemo 可能没有成本效益。在选择 Sugema-Chemo 与单独化疗时,必须考虑患者的体重和舒格利单抗的价格。国家医疗保障局降低舒格利单抗的价格可能是提高该药物成本效益的有效措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8838/10008846/87106999a000/fpubh-11-1054405-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8838/10008846/c68b977c59a5/fpubh-11-1054405-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8838/10008846/87106999a000/fpubh-11-1054405-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8838/10008846/c68b977c59a5/fpubh-11-1054405-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8838/10008846/87106999a000/fpubh-11-1054405-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Sugemalimab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.舒格利单抗联合化疗对比化疗治疗转移性非小细胞肺癌的成本效果分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;11:1054405. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1054405. eCollection 2023.
2
The Cost-Effectiveness of Sugemalimab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Squamous and Non-squamous NSCLC in China.苏格利单抗联合化疗作为中国转移性鳞状和非鳞状 NSCLC 一线治疗的成本效益分析。
Adv Ther. 2023 Oct;40(10):4298-4309. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02594-y. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of sugemalimab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line treatment in Chinese patients with metastatic NSCLC.舒格利单抗联合化疗作为中国转移性非小细胞肺癌患者一线治疗的成本效益分析
Lung Cancer. 2022 Dec;174:157-164. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.11.008. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
4
Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy is more cost-effective than chemotherapy alone as first-line therapy for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.替雷利珠单抗联合化疗对比单纯化疗作为晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌一线治疗方案具有更高的成本效益。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 30;11:1009920. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1009920. eCollection 2023.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of sugemalimab vs. placebo, in combination with chemotherapy, for treatment of first-line metastatic NSCLC in China.苏格利单抗对比安慰剂联合化疗治疗中国一线转移性 NSCLC 的成本效果分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 3;10:1015702. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1015702. eCollection 2022.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line serplulimab combined with chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.一线塞普鲁单抗联合化疗治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的成本效果分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 31;11:1156427. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1156427. eCollection 2023.
7
Cost‑effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.替雷利珠单抗联合化疗治疗中国晚期或转移性食管鳞癌患者的成本-效果分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 31;14(1):17734. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68399-3.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of sugemalimab vs. chemotherapy as first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer.苏金单抗与化疗作为转移性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的成本效益分析
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 12;13:996914. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.996914. eCollection 2022.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of toripalimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China.特瑞普利单抗联合化疗对比单纯化疗用于中国晚期非小细胞肺癌的成本效果分析。
Front Immunol. 2023 May 29;14:1169752. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1169752. eCollection 2023.
10
Economic evaluation of first-line sugemalimab plus chemotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in China.中国转移性非小细胞肺癌一线苏金单抗联合化疗的经济学评价
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 13;12:1081750. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1081750. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
A Rare Histologic Transformation from EGFR-Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma to EGFR-Negative Squamous Cell Carcinoma After EGFR-TKIs Resistance: A Case Report.表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)耐药后,1例罕见的从EGFR阳性肺腺癌组织学转化为EGFR阴性鳞状细胞癌的病例报告
Onco Targets Ther. 2025 Jul 18;18:803-809. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S513879. eCollection 2025.
2
Cost‑effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.替雷利珠单抗联合化疗治疗中国晚期或转移性食管鳞癌患者的成本-效果分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 31;14(1):17734. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68399-3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Sugemalimab: First Approval.苏吉妥单抗:首次批准。
Drugs. 2022 Apr;82(5):593-599. doi: 10.1007/s40265-022-01693-4.
2
Sugemalimab versus placebo, in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, as first-line treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (GEMSTONE-302): interim and final analyses of a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 clinical trial.舒格利单抗联合铂类化疗对比安慰剂一线治疗转移性非小细胞肺癌(GEMSTONE-302):一项双盲、随机、III 期临床研究的期中及最终分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Feb;23(2):220-233. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00650-1. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
3
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) Statement: Updated Reporting Guidance for Health Economic Evaluations.
Cost-effectiveness of tumor-treating fields plus standard therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer progressed after platinum-based therapy in the United States.
肿瘤治疗电场联合标准疗法用于美国铂类治疗后进展的晚期非小细胞肺癌的成本效益分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Feb 5;15:1333128. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1333128. eCollection 2024.
4
The Cost-Effectiveness of Sugemalimab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Squamous and Non-squamous NSCLC in China.苏格利单抗联合化疗作为中国转移性鳞状和非鳞状 NSCLC 一线治疗的成本效益分析。
Adv Ther. 2023 Oct;40(10):4298-4309. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02594-y. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
《2022 年健康经济评估报告标准》(CHEERS 2022)声明:健康经济评估报告的更新指南。
Value Health. 2022 Jan;25(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1351.
4
Cancer statistics, 2022.癌症统计数据,2022 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
5
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment in Patients With IIIB-IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Without EGFR and ALK Alteration from a Perspective of Health - Care System in China.从中国医疗保健系统角度看,卡瑞利珠单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗作为ⅢB - Ⅳ期无表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)和间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)改变的非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者一线治疗的成本效益分析
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Dec 24;12:735536. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.735536. eCollection 2021.
6
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Placebo Added to Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in China.卡瑞利珠单抗联合安慰剂加化疗作为中国晚期或转移性食管鳞状细胞癌一线治疗的成本效益分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 1;11:790373. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.790373. eCollection 2021.
7
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Pneumonitis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Understanding in Characteristics, Diagnosis, and Management.免疫检查点抑制剂相关肺炎在非小细胞肺癌中的特征、诊断和管理的最新认识。
Front Immunol. 2021 May 28;12:663986. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.663986. eCollection 2021.
8
[Chinese Experts Consensus on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors 
for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (2020 Version)].《中国非小细胞肺癌免疫检查点抑制剂临床应用专家共识(2020年版)》
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2021 Apr 20;24(4):217-235. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2021.101.13. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
9
Assessing the Value of Cemiplimab for Adults With Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.评估西妥昔单抗在治疗晚期皮肤鳞状细胞癌成人患者中的价值:成本效益分析。
Value Health. 2021 Mar;24(3):377-387. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.09.014. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
10
Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗与索拉非尼作为不可切除肝细胞癌一线治疗的成本效果比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e210037. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0037.