Mousavi Baigi Seyyedeh Fatemeh, Sarbaz Masoumeh, Ghaddaripouri Kosar, Ghaddaripouri Maryam, Mousavi Atefeh Sadat, Kimiafar Khalil
Department of Health Information Technology, School of Paramedical and Rehabilitation Sciences Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran.
Student Research Committee Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran.
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 12;6(3):e1138. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1138. eCollection 2023 Mar.
This systematic review examined healthcare students' attitudes, knowledge, and skill in Artificial Intelligence (AI).
On August 3, 2022, studies were retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations were followed. We included cross-sectional studies that examined healthcare students' knowledge, attitudes, skills, and perceptions of AI in this review. Using the eligibility requirements as a guide, titles and abstracts were screened. Complete texts were then retrieved and independently reviewed per the eligibility requirements. To collect data, a standardized form was used.
Of the 38 included studies, 29 (76%) of healthcare students had a positive and promising attitude towards AI in the clinical profession and its use in he future; however, in nine of the studies (24%), students considered AI a threat to healthcare fields and had a negative attitude towards it. Furthermore, 26 studies evaluated the knowledge of healthcare students about AI. Among these, 18 studies evaluated the level of student knowledge as low (50%). On the other hand, in six of the studies, students' high knowledge of AI was reported, and two of the studies reported average student general knowledge (almost 50%). Of the six studies, four (67%) of the students had very low skills, so they stated that they had never worked with AI.
Evidence from this review shows that healthcare students had a positive and promising attitude towards AI in medicine; however, most students had low knowledge and limited skills in working with AI. Face-to-face instruction, training manuals, and detailed instructions are therefore crucial for implementing and comprehending how AI technology works and raising students' knowledge of the advantages of AI.
本系统评价考察了医学生对人工智能(AI)的态度、知识和技能。
2022年8月3日,从PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中检索研究。遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目建议。本评价纳入了考察医学生对AI的知识、态度、技能和认知的横断面研究。以纳入标准为指导,筛选标题和摘要。然后检索全文,并根据纳入标准进行独立评审。使用标准化表格收集数据。
在纳入的38项研究中,29项(76%)研究表明医学生对AI在临床职业中的应用及其未来使用持积极且有前景的态度;然而,在9项研究(24%)中,学生认为AI对医疗领域构成威胁,并对其持消极态度。此外,26项研究评估了医学生对AI的知识。其中,18项研究评估学生的知识水平较低(50%)。另一方面,在6项研究中,报告了学生对AI的高知识水平,2项研究报告学生的一般知识水平中等(近50%)。在这6项研究中,4项(67%)学生的技能非常低,因此他们表示从未使用过AI。
本评价的证据表明,医学生对医学中的AI持积极且有前景的态度;然而,大多数学生在使用AI方面知识水平较低且技能有限。因此,面对面教学、培训手册和详细说明对于实施和理解AI技术的工作原理以及提高学生对AI优势的认识至关重要。