Key Laboratory of Trace Elements and Endemic Diseases of National Health and Family Planning Commission, School of Public Health, Health Science Center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Psychiatr Genet. 2023 Apr 1;33(2):59-68. doi: 10.1097/YPG.0000000000000334. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
In this study designed to investigate the effect of diet and gut microbiome on neuropsychiatric disorders, we explored the mechanisms of the interaction between diet and gut microbiome on the risk of neuroticism.
First, using the individual genotype data from the UK Biobank cohort (N = 306 165), we calculated the polygenic risk score (PRS) based on 814 dietary habits single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), 21 diet compositions SNPs and 1001 gut microbiome SNPs, respectively. Gut microbiome and diet-associated SNPs were collected from three genome-wide association studies (GWAS), including the gut microbiome (N = 3890), diet compositions (over 235 000 subjects) and dietary habits (N = 449 210). The neuroticism score was calculated by 12 questions from the Eysenck Personality Inventory Neuroticism scale. Then, regression analysis was performed to evaluate the interaction effects between diet and the gut microbiome on the risk of neuroticism.
Our studies demonstrated multiple candidate interactions between diet and gut microbiome, such as protein vs. Bifidobacterium (β = 4.59 × 10-3; P = 9.45 × 10-3) and fat vs. Clostridia (β = 3.67 × 10-3; P = 3.90 × 10-2). In addition, pieces of fresh fruit per day vs. Ruminococcus (β = -5.79 × 10-3, P = 1.10 × 10-3) and pieces of dried fruit per day vs. Clostridiales (β = -5.63 × 10-3, P = 1.49 × 10-3) were found to be negatively associated with neuroticism in fruit types. We also identified several positive interactions, such as tablespoons of raw vegetables per day vs. Veillonella (β = 5.92 × 10-3, P = 9.21 × 10-4) and cooked vegetables per day vs. Acidaminococcaceae (β = 5.69 × 10-3, P = 1.24 × 10-3).
Our results provide novel clues for understanding the roles of diet and gut microbiome in the development of neuroticism.
本研究旨在探讨饮食和肠道微生物群对神经精神疾病的影响,探索饮食和肠道微生物群相互作用对神经质风险的机制。
首先,我们使用来自英国生物库队列的个体基因型数据(N=306165),分别基于 814 种饮食习惯单核苷酸多态性(SNP)、21 种饮食成分 SNP 和 1001 种肠道微生物组 SNP 计算多基因风险评分(PRS)。肠道微生物组和饮食相关 SNP 来自三项全基因组关联研究(GWAS),包括肠道微生物组(N=3890)、饮食成分(超过 235000 名受试者)和饮食习惯(N=449210)。神经质评分通过艾森克人格问卷神经质量表的 12 个问题计算。然后,进行回归分析以评估饮食和肠道微生物组之间的交互作用对神经质风险的影响。
我们的研究表明,饮食和肠道微生物组之间存在多种候选相互作用,例如蛋白质与双歧杆菌(β=4.59×10-3;P=9.45×10-3)和脂肪与梭菌(β=3.67×10-3;P=3.90×10-2)。此外,每天摄入的新鲜水果量与 Ruminococcus(β=-5.79×10-3,P=1.10×10-3)和每天摄入的干果量与 Clostridiales(β=-5.63×10-3,P=1.49×10-3)呈负相关。我们还发现了一些阳性相互作用,例如每天摄入的生蔬菜量与韦荣球菌(β=5.92×10-3,P=9.21×10-4)和每天摄入的熟蔬菜量与 Acidaminococcaceae(β=5.69×10-3,P=1.24×10-3)。
我们的研究结果为理解饮食和肠道微生物组在神经质发展中的作用提供了新的线索。