Department of Animal Science and Aquaculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, NS B2N 5E3, Canada; Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Poult Sci. 2023 May;102(5):102602. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102602. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
Mitigating the negative effects of heat stress (HS) is a critical challenge for the global poultry industry. This study evaluated the thermoregulatory potential of 3 in ovo delivered bioactive substances using selected gut health parameters. Eggs were incubated and allotted to 5 groups, and respective bioactive substances delivered. These groups included-the noninjected, in ovo saline, in ovo folic acid (FA), in ovo probiotics (P), and in ovo essential oil (EO). At hatch, chicks were assigned to 5 new posthatch treatment combinations, including A) Negative control (NC)-noninjected eggs offered a basal corn-wheat-soybean diet, B) Antibiotics-NC + 0.05% bacitracin methylene disalicylate, C) In ovo FA-eggs injected with FA + NC diet, D) In ovo probiotics-eggs injected with probiotics + NC diet, E) In ovo + in-water EO-eggs injected with EO and supplied EO via drinking water + NC diet. Birds were raised for 28 d in 8 replicate cages/treatment (6 birds/cage) and exposed to either a thermoneutral (24°C ± 0.2) or HS challenge (31°C) condition from d 21 to d 28. The in ovo delivered FA and EO treatments reduced (P < 0.001) hatchability by at least 26% compared to NC. Induced HS reduced (P < 0.001) total plasma protein, total antioxidant capacity, and villus width in the duodenum and jejunum. Independent of HS and compared to NC, the in ovo + in-water EO treatment resulted in (P < 0.05) at least a 15% increase in villus height: crypt depth across the 3 gut sections. The in ovo + in-water EO treatment also increased the relative mRNA expression of intestinal barrier-related genes (Claudin1,3,4, Occludin, Zona occludens-2, and Mucin 2). Under HS, the in ovo + in-water EO treatment recorded a 3.5-fold upregulation of amino acid transporter gene (SLC1A1), compared to NC. Subject to further hatchability optimization, the in ovo + in-water delivery of EO show potential to afford broiler chicken thermotolerance.
缓解热应激(HS)的负面影响是全球家禽业面临的一个关键挑战。本研究使用选定的肠道健康参数评估了 3 种胚内传递的生物活性物质的体温调节潜力。鸡蛋在孵化过程中被孵育并分配到 5 个组中,并分别传递相应的生物活性物质。这些组包括-非注射、胚内生理盐水、胚内叶酸(FA)、胚内益生菌(P)和胚内精油(EO)。孵化后,小鸡被分配到 5 个新的孵化后处理组合中,包括 A)阴性对照(NC)-非注射鸡蛋提供基础玉米-小麦-大豆饮食,B)抗生素-NC+0.05%杆菌肽甲硫二水杨酸,C)胚内 FA-注射 FA+NC 饮食的鸡蛋,D)胚内益生菌-注射益生菌+NC 饮食的鸡蛋,E)胚内+水中 EO-注射 EO 并通过饮用水提供 EO+NC 饮食的鸡蛋。鸟类在 8 个重复笼/处理(6 只/笼)中饲养 28 天,并在第 21 天至第 28 天期间分别暴露于热中性(24°C±0.2)或 HS 挑战(31°C)条件下。与 NC 相比,胚内传递的 FA 和 EO 处理至少降低(P<0.001)了 26%的孵化率。诱导的 HS 降低了十二指肠和空肠总血浆蛋白、总抗氧化能力和绒毛宽度。与 NC 相比,与 HS 无关,胚内+水中 EO 处理至少使 3 个肠道段的绒毛高度:隐窝深度增加 15%(P<0.05)。胚内+水中 EO 处理还增加了肠道屏障相关基因(Claudin1、3、4、Occludin、Zona occludens-2 和 Mucin 2)的相对 mRNA 表达。在 HS 下,与 NC 相比,胚内+水中 EO 处理记录到氨基酸转运基因(SLC1A1)的上调 3.5 倍。在进一步优化孵化率的前提下,胚内+水中 EO 的传递有可能为肉鸡提供耐热性。