Fairness metrics for health AI: we have a long way to go.
作者信息
Mbakwe Amarachi B, Lourentzou Ismini, Celi Leo Anthony, Wu Joy T
机构信息
Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Institute of Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
出版信息
EBioMedicine. 2023 Apr;90:104525. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104525. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Fairness metrics for health AI: we have a long way to go.
EBioMedicine. 2023 Apr;90:104525. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104525. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
2
Fairness in Artificial Intelligence: Regulatory Sanbox Evaluation of Bias Prevention for ECG Classification.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023 May 18;302:488-489. doi: 10.3233/SHTI230184.
3
Show Your Work: Responsible Model Reporting in Health Care Artificial Intelligence.
Surg Clin North Am. 2023 Jun;103(2S):e1-e11. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 May 9.
4
Using the Veil of Ignorance to align AI systems with principles of justice.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 2;120(18):e2213709120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2213709120. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
5
Framework and metrics for the clinical use and implementation of artificial intelligence algorithms into endoscopy practice: recommendations from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Artificial Intelligence Task Force.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 May;97(5):815-824.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.10.016. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
6
A clarification of the nuances in the fairness metrics landscape.
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 10;12(1):4209. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07939-1.
7
Artificial Intelligence and Cancer Control: Toward Prioritizing Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (JEDI) in Emerging Decision Support Technologies.
Curr Oncol Rep. 2023 May;25(5):387-424. doi: 10.1007/s11912-023-01376-7. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
8
Benchmarks for social justice: assessing the fairness of academic conference participation.
Promot Educ. 2005;12(2):71-6.
9
Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Diabetic Retinopathy Screening.
Curr Diab Rep. 2022 Jun;22(6):267-274. doi: 10.1007/s11892-022-01467-y. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
10
Who should be first? How and when AI-human order influences procedural justice in a multistage decision-making process.
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 17;18(7):e0284840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284840. eCollection 2023.
引用本文的文献
1
Using a Multilingual AI Care Agent to Reduce Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening for Higher Fecal Immunochemical Test Adoption Among Spanish-Speaking Patients: Retrospective Analysis.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 25;27:e71211. doi: 10.2196/71211.
2
A scoping review and evidence gap analysis of clinical AI fairness.
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jun 14;8(1):360. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01667-2.
3
Learning and diSentangling patient static information from time-series Electronic hEalth Records (STEER).
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Oct 21;3(10):e0000640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000640. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Addressing fairness issues in deep learning-based medical image analysis: a systematic review.
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Oct 17;7(1):286. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01276-5.
5
Unmasking biases and navigating pitfalls in the ophthalmic artificial intelligence lifecycle: A narrative review.
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Oct 8;3(10):e0000618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000618. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
Health equity assessment of machine learning performance (HEAL): a framework and dermatology AI model case study.
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Mar 14;70:102479. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102479. eCollection 2024 Apr.
7
Diagnostic suspicion bias and machine learning: Breaking the awareness deadlock for sepsis detection.
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Nov 1;2(11):e0000365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000365. eCollection 2023 Nov.
8
A translational perspective towards clinical AI fairness.
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Sep 14;6(1):172. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00918-4.
本文引用的文献
1
Algorithmic encoding of protected characteristics in chest X-ray disease detection models.
EBioMedicine. 2023 Mar;89:104467. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104467. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
2
Algorithmic transparency and interpretability measures improve radiologists' performance in BI-RADS 4 classification.
Eur Radiol. 2023 Mar;33(3):1844-1851. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09165-9. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
3
AI recognition of patient race in medical imaging: a modelling study.
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Jun;4(6):e406-e414. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00063-2. Epub 2022 May 11.
4
Underdiagnosis bias of artificial intelligence algorithms applied to chest radiographs in under-served patient populations.
Nat Med. 2021 Dec;27(12):2176-2182. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01595-0. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
5
Transparency of deep neural networks for medical image analysis: A review of interpretability methods.
Comput Biol Med. 2022 Jan;140:105111. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105111. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
Zotero 插件