Vacuum-Induced Hemorrhage Control versus Uterine Balloon Tamponade for Postpartum Hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE

To compare maternal outcomes of uterine balloon tamponade (UBT) versus an intrauterine vacuum-induced hemorrhage control device (VHD) for the management of primary postpartum hemorrhage (PPH).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of all patients with PPH due to uterine atony treated with an intrauterine device within a university health system from January 2019 to June 2021. The primary outcome of massive transfusion, defined as PPH requiring transfusion of ≥4 units of packed red blood cells (PRBC), was compared between 2 groups: UBT (n = 78) versus VHD (n = 36). Statistical analysis included the use of chi-squared and Wilcoxon rank sum tests with statistical significance set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. The proportion of patients who received ≥4 units of PRBC was significantly lower in the VHD group compared to the UBT group (2.8% vs. 20.5%, P = <0.01). The proportion of patients who were transfused ≥2 units of PRBC and median estimated blood loss (EBL) were also both significantly lower in the VHD group compared to the UBT group (36.1% vs. 57.7%, P = < 0.01, and 1 500 mL vs. 1 875 mL, P = 0.02, respectively). Rates of other secondary outcomes were similar between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that the use of intrauterine VHD in the management of PPH is associated with a lower number of massive transfusions and EBL compared to UBT. Randomized controlled trials are needed before drawing definitive conclusions on which device is more effective in this setting.