Suppr超能文献

克服钢的元素分析中的基体效应:激光烧蚀-火花放电-光谱发射法(LA-SD-OES)和激光诱导击穿光谱法(LIBS)。

Overcoming the matrix effect in the element analysis of steel: Laser ablation-spark discharge-optical emission spectroscopy (LA-SD-OES) and Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS).

机构信息

Institute of Applied Physics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, A-4040, Linz, Austria.

Institute of Applied Physics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, A-4040, Linz, Austria.

出版信息

Anal Chim Acta. 2023 Apr 22;1251:341005. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2023.341005. Epub 2023 Feb 27.

Abstract

The optical emission of plasma on industrial steel samples induced by Laser Ablation-Spark Discharge-Optical Emission Spectroscopy (LA-SD-OES) and by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) is investigated and correlated to the volume of ablated steel material. The 36 steel samples investigated have an iron content C(Fe) above 94 wt%. The excitation energy in LIBS (laser pulse of 55 mJ) and in LA-SD-OES (laser pulse of 5 mJ and spark discharge of 50 mJ) is the same. In LA-SD-OES, the optical emission of plasma and the size of ablation craters are very similar for all samples and a linear calibration curve for Mn is measured (R = 0.99). In LIBS, however, a pronounced dependence of the plasma emission and of the crater volume on the steel matrix is observed and calibration curves show a strong cross-sensitivity to other elements such as Si (matrix effect). The hardness, grain size, and phase of steel samples are analyzed to correlate the matrix effect in LIBS measurements to a physical property of the specimen. The different behavior for LA-SD-OES and LIBS is probably due to different processes of sampling and plasma excitation. From our results we conclude that LA-SD-OES enables for the element analysis of industrial steel largely independent of composition and structure of samples while in LIBS the matrix effect has to be taken into account.

摘要

采用激光烧蚀-火花放电-光谱(LA-SD-OES)和激光诱导击穿光谱(LIBS)研究了工业钢样品等离子体的光发射,并将其与烧蚀钢材料的体积相关联。所研究的 36 个钢样品的铁含量 C(Fe)高于 94wt%。LIBS(55mJ 的激光脉冲)和 LA-SD-OES(5mJ 的激光脉冲和 50mJ 的火花放电)中的激发能量相同。在 LA-SD-OES 中,对于所有样品,等离子体的光发射和烧蚀凹坑的尺寸非常相似,并测量了 Mn 的线性校准曲线(R=0.99)。然而,在 LIBS 中,观察到等离子体发射和凹坑体积对钢基体的明显依赖性,校准曲线显示出对其他元素(如 Si(基体效应))的强烈交叉灵敏度。分析钢样品的硬度、晶粒尺寸和相,将 LIBS 测量中的基体效应与样品的物理性质相关联。LA-SD-OES 和 LIBS 的不同行为可能归因于不同的采样和等离子体激发过程。根据我们的结果,我们得出结论,LA-SD-OES 能够在很大程度上独立于样品的组成和结构进行工业钢的元素分析,而在 LIBS 中,必须考虑基体效应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验