勘误：利用在线眼动追踪技术辨别文化背景对真假新闻决策的影响。
Corrigendum: Utilising online eye-tracking to discern the impacts of cultural backgrounds on fake and real news decision-making.
作者信息
Brockinton Amanda, Hirst Sam, Wang Ruijie, McAlaney John, Thompson Shelley
机构信息
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Poole, United Kingdom.
Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Social Sciences and Health, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.
出版信息
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 28;14:1140818. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1140818. eCollection 2023.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.999780.].
摘要
[本文更正了文章DOI：10.3389/fpsyg.2022.999780。]
相似文献
1
Corrigendum: Utilising online eye-tracking to discern the impacts of cultural backgrounds on fake and real news decision-making.勘误：利用在线眼动追踪技术辨别文化背景对真假新闻决策的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 28;14:1140818. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1140818. eCollection 2023.
2
Utilising online eye-tracking to discern the impacts of cultural backgrounds on fake and real news decision-making.利用在线眼动追踪技术来辨别文化背景对真假新闻决策的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 13;13:999780. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.999780. eCollection 2022.
3
Spreading of fake news, competence and learning: kinetic modelling and numerical approximation.虚假新闻的传播、能力与学习：动力学建模与数值逼近。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2022 May 30;380(2224):20210159. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2021.0159. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
4
Designing for fake news literacy training: A problem-based undergraduate online-course.为虚假新闻素养培训设计：一门基于问题的本科在线课程。
Comput Human Behav. 2021 Aug;121:106796. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106796. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
5
A systematic literature review and existing challenges toward fake news detection models.关于假新闻检测模型的系统文献综述及现存挑战。
Soc Netw Anal Min. 2022;12(1):168. doi: 10.1007/s13278-022-00995-5. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
6
Corrigendum: Fake News or Weak Science? Visibility and Characterization of Antivaccine Webpages Returned by Google in Different Languages and Countries.勘误：假新闻还是薄弱的科学？谷歌返回的不同语言和国家的反疫苗网页的可见性与特征
Front Immunol. 2019 Oct 1;10:2252. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02252. eCollection 2019.
7
Corrigendum: Do Animals Engage Greater Social Attention in Autism? An Eye Tracking Analysis.勘误：动物在自闭症中是否会给予更多社交关注？一项眼动追踪分析。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 16;11:584787. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584787. eCollection 2020.
8
Corrigendum: Sincerity Is in the Eye of the Beholder: Using Eye Tracking to Understand How Victims Interpret an Offender's Apology in a Simulation of Victim-Offender Mediation.勘误：旁观者清：在受害者-犯罪者调解模拟中使用眼动追踪来理解受害者如何解读犯罪者的道歉。
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 31;11:1943. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01943. eCollection 2020.
9
Corrigendum: Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?勘误：法律概率决策中存在合取谬误吗？
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 27;9:2281. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02281. eCollection 2018.
10
Online Fake News about Food: Self-Evaluation, Social Influence, and the Stages of Change Moderation.网络食品谣言：自我评估、社会影响与改变阶段的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 12;18(6):2934. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062934.
Zotero 插件