Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2024 Jun;9(3):e830-e838. doi: 10.1089/can.2022.0157. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
This study experimentally tested whether there is a gateway-type effect of cannabis administration on tobacco and cocaine motivation and whether motivational responses predicted use 6 months later. A 2 (condition: active cannabis vs. placebo joint)×3 (substance stimulus type: tobacco, cannabis, and cocaine) factor within-subjects design for both implicit and explicit motivation. Both experimental sessions were conducted in a cannabis dispensary ("coffeeshop") in Amsterdam and were separated by ∼1 week, followed by a 6-month online follow-up. Eighty-five participants between 18 and 27 years of age (57% male), who used cannabis, tobacco, and cocaine <15 times per month, participated in session 1 (session 2: =79 and follow-up: =81). Counterbalanced over sessions, participants smoked an active and a placebo joint following a paced puffing procedure. Before and after smoking, craving and avoidance (explicit motivation) were assessed using visual analog scales, and after smoking, the stimulus response compatibility test was completed to assess approach biases (implicit motivation). Self-reported intoxication and similarity to their usual smoking experience were assessed at the end of both sessions. Self-reported frequency/quantity and dependence symptoms for tobacco, cannabis, and cocaine were assessed at all time points. A linear mixed model approach was used to assess the effects of condition, substance stimulus type, and their interactions on explicit and implicit motivation. In the active condition, participants reported higher levels of intoxication and an experience more similar to their usual smoking experience than in the placebo condition. There was no significant effect of condition, substance type, or their interaction on approach bias. Participants exhibited increased cannabis craving during the placebo condition only and increased explicit cannabis avoidance during the active condition only. Explicit tobacco avoidance decreased during both conditions. Baseline measures did not predict use at 6-month follow-up. In light users, cannabis intoxication did not affect implicit and explicit tobacco or cocaine motivations. Tobacco avoidance decreased regardless of condition, indicating that the cannabis cue-rich setting-rather than tetrahydrocannabinol itself-may momentarily increase the likelihood to smoke tobacco. However, motivation at baseline did not predict use 6 months later, deeming any gateway-like function unlikely.
这项研究通过实验测试了大麻给药是否存在烟草和可卡因动机的门户效应,以及动机反应是否可以预测 6 个月后的使用情况。在阿姆斯特丹的一家大麻药房(“咖啡店”)进行了一项为期 2 (条件:活性大麻与安慰剂联合)×3 (物质刺激类型:烟草、大麻和可卡因)的被试内因子设计,用于内隐和外显动机。两次实验都在大麻药房(“咖啡店”)中进行,两次实验之间间隔约 1 周,随后进行了 6 个月的在线随访。共有 85 名年龄在 18 至 27 岁之间(57%为男性)的参与者参与了第 1 次实验(第 2 次实验:=79 名,随访:=81 名),这些参与者每月使用大麻、烟草和可卡因的次数少于 15 次。参与者在实验过程中被随机分配,先吸入活性大麻和安慰剂烟卷,然后按照一定的吸气流速吸烟。吸烟前后,参与者使用视觉模拟量表评估渴望和回避(外显动机),吸烟后完成刺激反应相容性测试,以评估接近偏差(内隐动机)。在两次实验结束时,参与者都要评估自己的陶醉程度和与通常吸烟体验的相似程度。在所有时间点,参与者都要自我报告烟草、大麻和可卡因的使用频率/数量和依赖症状。采用线性混合模型方法评估条件、物质刺激类型及其相互作用对内外显动机的影响。在活性条件下,参与者报告的陶醉程度更高,吸烟体验与通常吸烟体验更相似,而在安慰剂条件下则不然。条件、物质类型及其相互作用对接近偏差均无显著影响。只有在安慰剂条件下,参与者才会增加对大麻的渴望,而只有在活性条件下,参与者才会增加对外显的大麻回避。在两种条件下,外显的烟草回避都会减少。基线测量值不能预测 6 个月后的使用情况。在轻度使用者中,大麻陶醉并不会影响对烟草或可卡因的内隐和外显动机。无论条件如何,烟草回避都会减少,这表明大麻线索丰富的环境——而不是四氢大麻酚本身——可能会暂时增加吸烟的可能性。然而,基线时的动机并不能预测 6 个月后的使用情况,因此不太可能存在类似门户的功能。