Suppr超能文献

消费者更喜欢哪种医疗服务方式:面对面、电话还是视频会议?

How do consumers prefer their care delivered: In-person, telephone or videoconference?

机构信息

Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

J Telemed Telecare. 2024 Dec;30(10):1555-1562. doi: 10.1177/1357633X231160333. Epub 2023 Mar 17.

Abstract

AIM

To gain a better understanding of consumer experiences with and preferences for telephone and videoconference consultations (telehealth), and how these compare to traditional in-person consultations.

METHODS

A national cross-sectional survey was administered to a representative sample of Australian adults who have received a telehealth service within the last year. Consumers were recruited by Qualtrics® through their online sampling service. The sample was representative of the broader Australian population according to gender, age, location (state/territory), and place of residence (urban or remote). Information on demographics (e.g., age, gender, employment status), recent telehealth experience, and preferences for consultation modality was collected. To measure preferences consumers were asked to indicate which modality they would prefer (in-person, telephone, or videoconference) for different scenarios. These included consultations of various time lengths, and for the top ten conditions for which individuals sought a general practitioner.

RESULTS

A total of 1069 consumers completed the survey. When consumers were asked to describe their most recent telehealth appointment, most were for follow-up appointments (67%) and completed by telephone (77%) rather than by videoconference, and with a general practitioner (75%). In-person consultations at a clinic were the top preference in all clinical scenarios presented, except when needing a prescription or to receive test results. In these cases, a telephone consultation was the preferred modality. Inexperience with videoconference and duration of consultation influenced preference for consultation mode. Consumers preferred to have short consultations of around five minutes done by telehealth (telephone or videoconference), while they preferred in-person for longer consultations (up to 60 minutes).

CONCLUSIONS

Many Australians have used telehealth in the past year to access healthcare, with telephone being the most common form of communication. Given the option and the experience to date, consumers prefer telephone when consultations related to either prescriptions or test results. Experience with videoconference for consultations increased consumer preferences for using it for future consultations.

摘要

目的

更好地了解消费者对电话和视频咨询(远程医疗)的体验和偏好,以及这些偏好与传统的面对面咨询相比如何。

方法

对过去一年中接受过远程医疗服务的澳大利亚成年人进行了一项全国性的横断面调查。消费者通过 Qualtrics®的在线抽样服务招募。根据性别、年龄、地点(州/领地)和居住地(城市或偏远地区),该样本在更广泛的澳大利亚人群中具有代表性。收集了人口统计学信息(例如年龄、性别、就业状况)、最近的远程医疗体验和咨询方式偏好。为了衡量偏好,要求消费者在不同的场景下表明他们更喜欢哪种模式(面对面、电话或视频会议)。这些场景包括不同时间长度的咨询,以及个人寻求全科医生的前 10 种情况。

结果

共有 1069 名消费者完成了调查。当消费者被要求描述他们最近的远程医疗预约时,大多数是为了随访预约(67%),并且通过电话(77%)而不是视频会议进行,并且是由全科医生(75%)进行的。在所有提出的临床场景中,在诊所进行的面对面咨询都是首选,除非需要处方或接收检查结果。在这些情况下,电话咨询是首选模式。对视频会议的经验不足和咨询时间长短影响了对咨询模式的偏好。消费者希望通过远程医疗(电话或视频会议)进行大约五分钟的简短咨询,而他们更喜欢面对面进行更长时间的咨询(长达 60 分钟)。

结论

许多澳大利亚人在过去一年中通过远程医疗获得医疗保健,其中电话是最常见的沟通方式。在有选择和迄今为止的经验的情况下,当咨询涉及处方或检查结果时,消费者更喜欢电话。使用视频会议进行咨询的经验增加了消费者对未来咨询使用它的偏好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验