Dental Clinics Department, King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Division of Endodontics, Department of Clinical Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 16;13(1):4354. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31290-8.
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of two spacer materials (cotton pellet and polytetrafluoroethylene [PTFE]) on gap and void formation in the Cavit restoration used for endodontic temporization. Thirty-four extracted human single-rooted premolars were matched and allocated into two groups (n = 17/group) according to the access cavity spacer (cotton pellet or PTFE). Standardized endodontic access cavities were prepared in all the teeth. Subsequently, the teeth were scanned by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) to determine the volume of the access cavities. The teeth were then temporized by placing either cotton pellet or PTFE as spacer materials on the canal orifices, followed by the Cavit restoration. Following the temporization procedure, the teeth were subjected to a second micro-CT scan to determine the percentage volume of gaps and voids along the margins and within the Cavit restoration, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed using the Shapiro-Wilk and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with a 5% significance level. The PTFE spacer was associated with significantly less gap formation between the Cavit restoration and the access cavity walls (P < 0.05) compared with the cotton pellet. No difference existed in void formation between the groups (P > 0.05). These findings indicate that the spacer material placed under the Cavit restoration can influence the quality of overlying restoration. PTFE was associated with less gap formation and, therefore, performed better than the cotton pellet as a spacer material beneath the Cavit restoration during endodontic treatment.
本研究旨在评估两种间隔材料(棉片和聚四氟乙烯[PTFE])对 Cavit 暂封用于根管暂封的间隙和空隙形成的影响。根据.access 腔间隔(棉片或 PTFE),将 34 颗提取的人单根前磨牙配对并分为两组(n = 17/组)。所有牙齿均制备标准根管 access 腔。随后,通过 micro-CT(micro-CT)扫描所有牙齿以确定 access 腔的体积。然后将牙齿用棉片或 PTFE 作为间隔材料放置在 canal 口上进行暂封,然后进行 Cavit 修复。暂封程序后,对牙齿进行第二次 micro-CT 扫描,以确定沿 Cavit 修复边缘和 Cavit 修复内的间隙和空隙的百分比体积。使用 Shapiro-Wilk 和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行统计分析,显著性水平为 5%。与棉片相比,PTFE 间隔物与 Cavit 修复和 access 腔壁之间的间隙形成明显减少(P < 0.05)。两组之间的空隙形成无差异(P > 0.05)。这些发现表明,放置在 Cavit 修复下方的间隔材料会影响覆盖修复的质量。与棉片相比,PTFE 与 Cavit 修复下方的间隙形成较少,因此作为间隔材料表现更好。