Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, UK.
J Health Organ Manag. 2023 Mar 17;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):273-87. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2022-0017.
This study aims to compare and contrast the core organisational processes across high and low performing mental health providers in the English National Health Service (NHS).
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A multiple case study qualitative design incorporating a full sample of low and high performing mental health providers.
This study suggests that the organisational approaches used to govern and manage mental health providers are associated with their performance, and the study's findings give clues as to what areas might need attention. They include, but are not limited to: developing appropriate governance frameworks and organisational cultures, ensuring that staff across the organisation feel "psychologically safe" and able to speak up when they see things that are going wrong; a focus on enhancing quality of services rather than prioritising cost-reduction; investing in new technology and digital applications; and nurturing positive inter-organisational relationships across the local health economy.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Highlights considerable divergence in organisation and management practices that are associated with the performance of mental health trusts in the English NHS.
本研究旨在比较和对比英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中高绩效和低绩效精神卫生服务提供者的核心组织流程。
设计/方法/途径:采用全样本的高低绩效精神卫生服务提供者的多案例研究定性设计。
本研究表明,用于管理和治理精神卫生服务提供者的组织方法与其绩效相关,研究结果为需要关注的领域提供了线索。这些线索包括但不限于:制定适当的治理框架和组织文化,确保组织内的员工感到“心理安全”,并且在发现错误时能够直言不讳;关注提高服务质量而不是优先降低成本;投资新技术和数字应用;以及培养整个地方卫生经济中积极的组织间关系。
原创性/价值:突出了与英国 NHS 中精神卫生信托机构绩效相关的组织和管理实践的显著差异。