Suppr超能文献

通过 DCD 和 DMPP 硝化抑制剂来调解气态排放并提高植物生产力:对过去三十年的元分析。

Mediation of gaseous emissions and improving plant productivity by DCD and DMPP nitrification inhibitors: Meta-analysis of last three decades.

机构信息

Institute for Microbiology, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Soil and Environmental Sciences Division, Nuclear Institute of Agriculture (NIA), Tandojam, Pakistan.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(23):64719-64735. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26318-5. Epub 2023 Mar 16.

Abstract

Nitrification inhibitors (NIs), especially dicyandiamide (DCD) and 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP), have been extensively investigated to mitigate nitrogen (N) losses from the soil and thus improve crop productivity by enhancing N use efficiency. However, to provide crop and soil-specific guidelines about using these NIs, a quantitative assessment of their efficacy in mitigating gaseous emissions, worth for nitrate leaching, and improving crop productivity under different crops and soils is yet required. Therefore, based upon 146 peer-reviewed research studies, we conducted a meta-analysis to quantify the effect of DCD and DMPP on gaseous emissions, nitrate leaching, soil inorganic N, and crop productivity under different variates. The efficacy of the NIs in reducing the emissions of CO, CH, NO, and NO highly depends on the crop, soil, and experiment types. The comparative efficacy of DCD in reducing NO emission was higher than the DMPP under maize, grasses, and fallow soils in both organic and chemical fertilizer amended soils. The use of DCD was linked to increased NH emission in vegetables, rice, and grasses. Depending upon the crop, soil, and fertilizer type, both the NIs decreased nitrate leaching from soils; however, DMPP was more effective. Nevertheless, the effect of DCD on crop productivity indicators, including N uptake, N use efficiency, and biomass/yield was higher than DMPP due to certain factors. Moreover, among soils, crops, and fertilizer types, the response by plant productivity indicators to the application of NIs ranged between 35 and 43%. Overall, the finding of this meta-analysis strongly suggests the use of DCD and DMPP while considering the crop, fertilizer, and soil types.

摘要

硝化抑制剂(NIs),特别是双氰胺(DCD)和 3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸盐(DMPP),已被广泛研究用于减少土壤中的氮损失,从而通过提高氮利用效率来提高作物生产力。然而,为了提供针对这些 NIs 的作物和土壤特定指南,需要对其在减轻气态排放、减少硝酸盐淋失和提高不同作物和土壤下作物生产力方面的功效进行定量评估。因此,基于 146 项同行评议的研究,我们进行了荟萃分析,以量化 DCD 和 DMPP 对气态排放、硝酸盐淋失、土壤无机氮和不同变量下作物生产力的影响。NIs 减少 CO、CH、NO 和 NO 排放的功效高度取决于作物、土壤和实验类型。在有机和化肥施肥土壤中,DCD 在减少玉米、草和休耕地中 NO 排放方面的比较功效高于 DMPP。在蔬菜、水稻和草中,使用 DCD 与 NH 排放增加有关。根据作物、土壤和肥料类型,两种 NIs 都减少了土壤中的硝酸盐淋失;然而,DMPP 更有效。然而,由于某些因素,DCD 对包括氮吸收、氮利用效率和生物量/产量在内的作物生产力指标的影响高于 DMPP。此外,在土壤、作物和肥料类型中,植物生产力指标对 NIs 应用的响应范围在 35%至 43%之间。总体而言,这项荟萃分析的结果强烈表明,在考虑作物、肥料和土壤类型的情况下,可以使用 DCD 和 DMPP。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2cc/10172236/6fad17f414b4/11356_2023_26318_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验