Suppr超能文献

HBP 与 RVP 的随机比较:对左心室功能和胶原代谢生物标志物的影响。

A randomized comparison of HBP versus RVP: Effect on left ventricular function and biomarkers of collagen metabolism.

机构信息

Cardiocenter, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Kardiol Pol. 2023;81(5):472-481. doi: 10.33963/KP.a2023.0065. Epub 2023 Mar 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular pacing (RVP) can result in pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM). It is unknown whether specific biomarkers reflect differences between His bundle pacing (HBP) and RVP and predict a decrease in left ventricular function during RVP.

AIMS

We aimed to compare the effect of HBP and RVP on the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and to study how they affect serum markers of collagen metabolism.

METHODS

Ninety-two high-risk PICM patients were randomized to HBP or RVP groups. Their clinical characteristics, echocardiography, and serum levels of transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), suppression of tumorigenicity 2 interleukin (ST2-IL), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1), and galectin 3 (Gal-3) were studied before pacemaker implantation and six months later.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were randomized to the HBP group and 39 patients to the RVP group. HBP failed in 10 patients, who crossed over to the RVP group. Patients with RVP had significantly lower LVEF compared to HBP patients after six months of pacing (-5% and -4% in as-treated and intention-to-treat analysis, respectively). Levels of TGF-β1 after 6 months were lower in HBP than RVP patients (mean difference -6 ng/ml; P = 0.009) and preimplant Gal-3 and ST2-IL levels were higher in RVP patients, with a decline in LVEF ≥5% compared to those with a decline of <5% (mean difference 3 ng/ml and 8 ng/ml; P = 0.02 for both groups).

CONCLUSION

In high-risk PICM patients, HBP was superior to RVP in providing more physiological ventricular function, as reflected by higher LVEF and lower levels of TGF-β1. In RVP patients, LVEF declined more in those with higher baseline Gal-3 and ST2-IL levels than in those with lower levels.

摘要

背景

右心室起搏(RVP)可导致起搏诱导性心肌病(PICM)。目前尚不清楚特定的生物标志物是否反映了希氏束起搏(HBP)和 RVP 之间的差异,并预测 RVP 期间左心室功能下降。

目的

我们旨在比较 HBP 和 RVP 对左心室射血分数(LVEF)的影响,并研究它们如何影响胶原代谢的血清标志物。

方法

92 例高危 PICM 患者被随机分为 HBP 或 RVP 组。研究了他们的临床特征、超声心动图以及血清转化生长因子β1(TGF-β1)、基质金属蛋白酶 9(MMP-9)、肿瘤抑制因子 2 白细胞介素(ST2-IL)、金属蛋白酶组织抑制剂 1(TIMP-1)和半乳糖凝集素 3(Gal-3)水平,在起搏器植入前和 6 个月后进行了研究。

结果

53 例患者被随机分配到 HBP 组,39 例患者被分配到 RVP 组。10 例 HBP 患者失败,交叉到 RVP 组。与 HBP 患者相比,接受 RVP 治疗 6 个月后患者的 LVEF 明显较低(在按治疗和意向治疗分析中分别为 -5%和 -4%)。与 RVP 患者相比,HBP 患者 6 个月时的 TGF-β1 水平较低(平均差异 -6ng/ml;P=0.009),植入前 Gal-3 和 ST2-IL 水平较高,与 LVEF 下降≥5%的患者相比,LVEF 下降<5%的患者(两组平均差异 3ng/ml 和 8ng/ml;P=0.02)。

结论

在高危 PICM 患者中,HBP 在提供更生理性的心室功能方面优于 RVP,表现为更高的 LVEF 和更低的 TGF-β1 水平。在 RVP 患者中,基线 Gal-3 和 ST2-IL 水平较高的患者 LVEF 下降幅度大于水平较低的患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验