Roddy Meghan R, Sellers Austin R, Darville Kristina K, Teppa-Sanchez Beatriz, McKinley Scott D, Martin Meghan, Goldenberg Neil A, Nakagawa Thomas A, Sochet Anthony A
Departments of Pharmacy, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida, USA.
Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida, USA.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2023 Jun;58(6):1719-1727. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26386. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
Evidence for the use of dexamethasone for pediatric critical asthma is limited. We sought to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of dexamethasone versus methylprednisolone among children hospitalized in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) for critical asthma.
A prospective, single center, open-label, two-arm, parallel-group, nonrandomized trial among children ages 5-17 years hospitalized within the PICU from April 2019 to December 2021 for critical asthma consented to receive methylprednisolone (standard care) or dexamethasone (intervention) at a 2:1 allocation ratio, respectively. The intervention arm received intravenous dexamethasone 0.25 mg/kg/dose (max: 15 mg/dose) every 6 h for 48 h and the standard care arm intravenous methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg/dose every 6 h (max dose: 60 mg/dose) for 5 days. Study endpoints were clinical efficacy (i.e., length of stay [LOS], continuous albuterol duration, and a composite of adjunctive asthma interventions) and safety (i.e., corticosteroid-related adverse events).
Ninety-two participants were analyzed of whom 31 were allocated to the intervention arm and 61 the standard care arm. No differences in demographics, clinical characteristics, or acute/chronic asthma severity indices were observed. Regarding efficacy and safety endpoints, no differences in hospital LOS, continuous albuterol duration, adjunctive asthma intervention rates, or corticosteroid-related adverse events were noted. Compared to the intervention arm, participants in the standard care arm more frequently were prescribed corticosteroids at discharge (72% vs. 13%, p < 0.001).
Among children hospitalized for critical asthma, dexamethasone appears safe and warrants further investigation to fully assess clinical efficacy and potential advantages over commonly applied agents such as methylprednisolone.
地塞米松用于小儿重症哮喘的证据有限。我们试图比较地塞米松与甲泼尼龙在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)因重症哮喘住院儿童中的临床疗效和安全性。
一项前瞻性、单中心、开放标签、双臂、平行组、非随机试验,纳入2019年4月至2021年12月在PICU因重症哮喘住院的5至17岁儿童,他们同意分别按2:1的分配比例接受甲泼尼龙(标准治疗)或地塞米松(干预)。干预组每6小时静脉注射地塞米松0.25mg/kg/剂量(最大剂量:15mg/剂量),共48小时;标准治疗组每6小时静脉注射甲泼尼龙1mg/kg/剂量(最大剂量:60mg/剂量),共5天。研究终点为临床疗效(即住院时间[LOS]、持续使用沙丁胺醇的时间以及辅助哮喘干预措施的综合指标)和安全性(即与皮质类固醇相关的不良事件)。
分析了92名参与者,其中31名被分配到干预组,61名被分配到标准治疗组。在人口统计学、临床特征或急性/慢性哮喘严重程度指标方面未观察到差异。关于疗效和安全性终点,在住院LOS、持续使用沙丁胺醇的时间、辅助哮喘干预率或与皮质类固醇相关的不良事件方面未发现差异。与干预组相比,标准治疗组的参与者在出院时更频繁地被开具皮质类固醇药物(72%对13%,p<0.001)。
在因重症哮喘住院的儿童中,地塞米松似乎是安全的,值得进一步研究以全面评估其临床疗效以及相对于常用药物如甲泼尼龙的潜在优势。