Suppr超能文献

婴儿呼吸感应体积描记法校准方法的比较

Comparison of calibration methods for respiratory inductive plethysmography in infants.

作者信息

Revow M D, England S J, Stogryn H A, Wilkes D L

机构信息

Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 1987 Nov;63(5):1853-61. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1987.63.5.1853.

Abstract

In infants under the age of 6 mo respiratory inductive plethysmograph (RIP)-calculated tidal volumes (VT) were compared with simultaneously measured volumes using a pneumotachograph (PNT) to 1) assess whether using multiple points (MP) along the inspiratory profile of a breath is superior to using only VT when calculating volume-motion (VM) coefficients, 2) verify the assumption of independent contributions of the abdomen and rib cage to VT, which was accomplished by extending the normal RIP model to include a term representing interaction between these two compartments, and 3) investigate whether VM coefficients are sleep-state dependent. Neither use of multiple points nor inclusion of the interacting term improved the performance of the RIP over that observed using a simple two-compartment model with VT measurements. However, VM coefficients obtained during quiet sleep (QS) were not reliable when used during rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep, suggesting that coefficients obtained during one sleep state may not be applicable to another state where there is a substantial change in the relative abdominal/rib cage contributions to VT.

摘要

在6个月龄以下婴儿中,将呼吸感应体积描记器(RIP)计算的潮气量(VT)与同时使用呼吸流速仪(PNT)测量的体积进行比较,以:1)评估在计算体积运动(VM)系数时,沿呼吸吸气曲线使用多个点(MP)是否优于仅使用VT;2)验证腹部和胸廓对VT的独立贡献假设,这通过扩展正常的RIP模型以纳入代表这两个腔室之间相互作用的项来实现;3)研究VM系数是否依赖睡眠状态。无论是使用多个点还是纳入相互作用项,RIP的性能都没有比使用简单的双腔室VT测量模型时更好。然而,在安静睡眠(QS)期间获得的VM系数在快速眼动(REM)睡眠期间使用时不可靠,这表明在一种睡眠状态下获得的系数可能不适用于另一种睡眠状态,因为在另一种状态下腹部/胸廓对VT的相对贡献有很大变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验