Balerna Jessica A, Kramer Andrew M, Landry Shawn M, Rains Mark C, Lewis David B
Department of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA.
Department of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA.
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jul 1;337:117690. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117690. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
Wetlands provide essential ecosystem services, including nutrient cycling, flood protection, and biodiversity support, that are sensitive to changes in wetland hydrology. Wetland hydrological inputs come from precipitation, groundwater discharge, and surface run-off. Changes to these inputs via climate variation, groundwater extraction, and land development may alter the timing and magnitude of wetland inundation. Here, we use a long-term (14-year) comparative study of 152 depressional wetlands in west-central Florida to identify sources of variation in wetland inundation during two key time periods, 2005-2009 and 2010-2018. These time periods are separated by the enactment of water conservation policies in 2009, which included regional reductions in groundwater extraction. We investigated the response of wetland inundation to the interactive effects of precipitation, groundwater extraction, surrounding land development, basin geomorphology, and wetland vegetation class. Results show that water levels were lower and hydroperiods were shorter in wetlands of all vegetation classes during the first (2005-2009) time period, which corresponded with low rainfall conditions and high rates of groundwater extraction. Under water conservation policies enacted in the second (2010-2018) time period, median wetland water depths increased 1.35 m and median hydroperiods increased from 46 % to 83 %. Water-level variation was additionally less sensitive to groundwater extraction. The increase in inundation differed among vegetation classes with some wetlands not displaying signs of hydrological recovery. After accounting for effects of several explanatory factors, inundation still varied considerably among wetlands, suggesting a diversity of hydrological regimes, and thus ecological function, among individual wetlands across the landscape. Policies seeking to balance human water demand with the preservation of depressional wetlands would benefit by recognizing the heightened sensitivity of wetland inundation to groundwater extraction during periods of low precipitation.
湿地提供重要的生态系统服务,包括养分循环、防洪和生物多样性支持,这些服务对湿地水文变化很敏感。湿地水文输入来自降水、地下水排放和地表径流。通过气候变化、地下水开采和土地开发对这些输入的改变可能会改变湿地淹没的时间和程度。在这里,我们对佛罗里达州中西部的152个洼地湿地进行了为期14年的比较研究,以确定2005 - 2009年和2010 - 2018年这两个关键时期湿地淹没变化的来源。这两个时期以2009年水资源保护政策的颁布为界,该政策包括区域地下水开采量的减少。我们研究了湿地淹没对降水、地下水开采、周边土地开发、流域地貌和湿地植被类型之间相互作用的响应。结果表明,在第一个时期(2005 - 2009年),所有植被类型湿地的水位较低,水淹期较短,这与低降雨条件和高地下水开采率相对应。在第二个时期(2010 - 2018年)实施水资源保护政策后,湿地中位水深增加了1.35米,中位水淹期从46%增加到83%。水位变化对地下水开采的敏感性也降低了。不同植被类型的湿地淹没增加情况有所不同,一些湿地没有显示出水文恢复的迹象。在考虑了几个解释因素的影响后,湿地之间的淹没情况仍然差异很大,这表明整个景观中各个湿地的水文状况存在多样性,进而生态功能也存在多样性。旨在平衡人类用水需求与洼地湿地保护的政策,若能认识到在降水较少时期湿地淹没对地下水开采的高度敏感性,将受益匪浅。