• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Translated article] Design and validation of two instruments to analyze and evaluate the formal quality in the informed consent process of clinical trials with medicinal products.

作者信息

Jaramillo Vélez Andrea G, Aguas Compaired Margarita, Granados Plaza Montserrat, Mariño Eduardo L, Modamio Pilar

机构信息

Unidad de Farmacia Clínica y Atención Farmacéutica, Departamento de Farmacia y Tecnología Farmacéutica, y Fisicoquímica, Facultad de Farmacia y Ciencias de la Alimentación, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Unidad de Farmacia Clínica y Atención Farmacéutica, Departamento de Farmacia y Tecnología Farmacéutica, y Fisicoquímica, Facultad de Farmacia y Ciencias de la Alimentación, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Comité Ético de Investigación con medicamentos (CEIm) Idcsalud a Catalunya, Hospital Universitari General de Catalunya, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Farm Hosp. 2023 Mar-Apr;47(2):T64-T68. doi: 10.1016/j.farma.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.farma.2023.01.002
PMID:36934015
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The activity of sponsors and Ethics Committees for Research with medicines has increased in recent years. The objective was to design and validate 2 instruments to analyze and evaluate the formal quality of the patient information sheet and the informed consent form of clinical trials with drugs, in accordance with the legislation.

METHODS

Design (Guideline for good clinical practice and European and Spanish regulations); validation (Delphi method and expert consensus: concordance ≥ 80%); reliability (inter-observer method, Kappa index). 40 patient information sheets/informed consent forms were evaluated.

RESULTS

Very good concordance was obtained in both checklists (k ≥ 0.81, p b 0.001). The final versions consisted of checklist-patient information sheet: 5 sections, 16 items and 46 sub-items; and checklist-informed consent form: 11 items.

CONCLUSION

The instruments developed are valid, reliable and facilitate the analysis, evaluation, and decision-making on the patient information sheets/informed consent forms of clinical trials with drugs.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Translated article] Design and validation of two instruments to analyze and evaluate the formal quality in the informed consent process of clinical trials with medicinal products.
Farm Hosp. 2023 Mar-Apr;47(2):T64-T68. doi: 10.1016/j.farma.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
2
Design and validation of 2 instruments to analyze and evaluate the formal quality in the informed consent process of clinical trials with medicinal products.设计并验证 2 种工具,以分析和评估药品临床试验知情同意过程中的形式质量。
3
Assessment of the quality of patient information sheets and informed consent forms for clinical trials at a hospital neurology service.医院神经内科临床试验中患者信息单和知情同意书质量评估。
Eur J Neurol. 2020 Oct;27(10):1825-1831. doi: 10.1111/ene.14420. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
4
Informed consent: its importance for retrolective research and medical science progress.知情同意:其对回溯性研究和医学科学进步的重要性。
Gac Med Mex. 2021;157(1):90-93. doi: 10.24875/GMM.20000227.
5
Preparing accessible and understandable clinical research participant information leaflets and consent forms: a set of guidelines from an expert consensus conference.编写易于获取且通俗易懂的临床研究参与者信息手册和同意书:专家共识会议制定的一套指南
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 May 18;7(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00265-2.
6
Therapeutic misconception in clinical trials: fighting against it and living with it.临床试验中的治疗性误解:与之抗争并与之共存。
Rev Clin Esp (Barc). 2014 Nov;214(8):470-4. doi: 10.1016/j.rce.2014.03.013. Epub 2014 May 14.
7
Evaluation of consent forms for clinical practice in Spanish Public Hospitals.西班牙公立医院临床实践知情同意书的评估
J Healthc Qual Res. 2023 Mar-Apr;38(2):84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2022.08.006. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
8
Validation of Instruments for Assessing Drug Safety Management During the Conduction of Clinical Trials.临床试验实施过程中药物安全管理评估工具的验证。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jul 1;7(7):623-629. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.140.
9
Identifying essential information to support patient decision-making regarding participation in cancer clinical trials: A Delphi study.确定支持患者参与癌症临床试验决策的关键信息:一项德尔菲研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Nov;27(6):e12954. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12954.
10
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.