Suppr超能文献

局灶性隐匿性胎盘植入:产妇发病的隐匿性根源。

Focal-occult placenta accreta: a clandestine source of maternal morbidity.

机构信息

Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs Larish, Brunton, Schenone, and Theiler).

Diagnostic Radiology (Drs Horst, Packard, VanBuren, and Missert).

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Jun;5(6):100924. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100924. Epub 2023 Mar 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum is known to cause adverse obstetrical morbidity outcomes, however, direct comparisons with previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum morbidity are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the baseline characteristics, surgical and obstetrical morbidity, and subsequent pregnancy outcomes of patients with focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum with those of patients with previa-associated accreta.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review was conducted of all pathologically confirmed placenta accreta spectrum cases from 2018 to 2022 at a tertiary care center. The baseline characteristics, surgical, obstetrical, and subsequent pregnancy outcomes were recorded. Cases of focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum was compared with cases of previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum across a range of morbidity characteristics including hemorrhagic factors, interventions, postdelivery reoperations, infections, and intensive care unit admission. Statistical comparison was performed using Kruskal-Wallis or chi-square tests, and a P value of <.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 74 cases were identified with 43 focal-occult and 31 previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum cases. Of those, 25.6% of the patients with focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum and 100% of the patients with previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum underwent a hysterectomy. One case of focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum and 29 cases of previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum were diagnosed antenatally. Patients with focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum did not differ from those with previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum in mean maternal age (33.0 vs 33.1 years), body mass index, or the incidence of previous dilation and curettage procedures (16.3% vs 25.8%). Patients with focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum were significantly more likely to have a lower mean parity (1.5 vs 3.6 gestations), higher gestational age at delivery (36.1 vs 33.9 weeks' gestation), and were less likely to have had a previous cesarean delivery (12/43, 27.9% vs 30/31, 96.8%). In addition, patients with focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum had less previous cesarean deliveries (mean, 0.5 vs 2.3), were more likely to have undergone in vitro fertilization (20.9% vs 3.2%), and less likely to have anterior placentation. When contrasting the clinical outcomes of patients with focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum with those with previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum, the postpartum hemorrhage rates (71.0% vs 67.4%), mean quantitative blood loss (2099 mL; range, 500-9516 mL vs 2119 mL; range 350-12,220 mL), mean units of red blood cells transfused (1.4 vs 1.7), massive transfusion rate (9.3% vs 3.2%), and intensive care unit admission rates (11.6% vs 6.5%) were not significantly different, but there was a nonsignificant trend toward higher morbidity among patients with focal-occult accreta. Patients with focal-occult accreta had a higher incidence of reoperations or return to the operating room (30.2 vs 6.5%; P=.01). When comparing focal-occult with previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum, the composite outcomes, including hemorrhagic morbidity (77.4% vs 74.4%), any maternal morbidity (83.9% vs 76.7%), and severe maternal morbidity (64.5% vs 65.1%), were not significantly different between the groups. Nine focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum patients had a subsequent pregnancy, and 3 of those had recurrent placenta accreta spectrum.

CONCLUSION

Focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum presents with fewer identifiable risk factors than placenta previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum but may be associated with an in vitro fertilization pregnancy. Patients with focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum was observed to have a higher incidence of reoperation when compared with patients previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum, and no other statistically significant differences in morbidity outcomes were observed. The absence of differences in morbidity outcomes may be attributable to a lack of antenatal detection of focal-occult accreta and merits further investigation.

摘要

背景

局灶性隐匿性胎盘植入谱系已知会导致不良产科发病率结局,但与前置胎盘相关的胎盘植入谱系发病率缺乏直接比较。

目的

我们旨在比较局灶性隐匿性胎盘植入谱系患者与前置胎盘相关胎盘植入谱系患者的基线特征、手术和产科发病率以及随后的妊娠结局。

研究设计

对 2018 年至 2022 年在一家三级保健中心进行的所有经病理证实的胎盘植入谱系病例进行了回顾性分析。记录了基线特征、手术、产科和随后的妊娠结局。将局灶性隐匿性胎盘植入谱系病例与前置胎盘相关胎盘植入谱系病例在一系列发病率特征方面进行了比较,包括出血因素、干预措施、产后再次手术、感染和重症监护病房入院。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 或卡方检验进行统计学比较,P 值<.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

共确定了 74 例病例,其中 43 例为局灶性隐匿性胎盘植入谱系,31 例为前置胎盘相关胎盘植入谱系。在这些病例中,25.6%的局灶性隐匿性胎盘植入谱系患者和 100%的前置胎盘相关胎盘植入谱系患者接受了子宫切除术。1 例局灶性隐匿性胎盘植入谱系和 29 例前置胎盘相关胎盘植入谱系在产前被诊断。局灶性隐匿性胎盘植入谱系患者与前置胎盘相关胎盘植入谱系患者的平均产妇年龄(33.0 岁 vs. 33.1 岁)、体重指数或刮宫术的发生率(16.3% vs. 25.8%)无差异。局灶性隐匿性胎盘植入谱系患者的平均产次明显较低(1.5 次 vs. 3.6 次妊娠),分娩时的平均孕周较大(36.1 周 vs. 33.9 周),且剖宫产史较少(12/43,27.9% vs. 30/31,96.8%)。此外,局灶性隐匿性胎盘植入谱系患者的剖宫产次数较少(平均 0.5 次 vs. 2.3 次),更有可能接受体外受精(20.9% vs. 3.2%),且前置胎盘的可能性较小。将局灶性隐匿性胎盘植入谱系患者与前置胎盘相关胎盘植入谱系患者的临床结局进行对比时,产后出血率(71.0% vs. 67.4%)、平均出血量(2099 毫升;范围 500-9516 毫升 vs. 2119 毫升;范围 350-12220 毫升)、平均输血量(1.4 单位 vs. 1.7 单位)、大量输血率(9.3% vs. 3.2%)和重症监护病房入院率(11.6% vs. 6.5%)无显著差异,但局灶性隐匿性胎盘植入谱系患者的发病率有升高的趋势。局灶性隐匿性胎盘植入谱系患者的再手术或再次进入手术室的发生率较高(30.2% vs. 6.5%;P=.01)。将局灶性隐匿性胎盘植入谱系与前置胎盘相关胎盘植入谱系进行比较时,包括出血发病率(77.4% vs. 74.4%)、任何产妇发病率(83.9% vs. 76.7%)和严重产妇发病率(64.5% vs. 65.1%)在内的复合结局没有显著差异。9 例局灶性隐匿性胎盘植入谱系患者随后妊娠,其中 3 例再次发生胎盘植入谱系。

结论

局灶性隐匿性胎盘植入谱系与前置胎盘相关胎盘植入谱系相比,其可识别的危险因素较少,但可能与体外受精妊娠有关。与前置胎盘相关胎盘植入谱系相比,局灶性隐匿性胎盘植入谱系患者的再手术发生率较高,且在发病率结局方面无其他统计学显著差异。发病率结局无差异可能归因于局灶性隐匿性胎盘植入谱系的产前检出率较低,值得进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验