Andrade Marcelo T, Barbosa Nicolas H S, Souza-Junior Roberto C S, Fonseca Cletiana G, Damasceno William C, Regina-Oliveira Kássya, Drummond Lucas R, Bittencourt Myla A, Kunstetter Ana C, Andrade Pedro V R, Hudson Alexandre S R, Paula Pedro H, Teixeira-Coelho Francisco, Coimbra Cândido C, Pires Washington, Wanner Samuel P
Exercise Physiology Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, MG, 31.270-901, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Department of Physical Education, Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais, Unidade Divinópolis, MG, Divinópolis, Brazil.
Int J Biometeorol. 2023 May;67(5):761-775. doi: 10.1007/s00484-023-02453-z. Epub 2023 Mar 19.
Understanding the factors that underlie the physical exercise-induced increase in body core temperature (T) is essential to developing strategies to counteract hyperthermic fatigue and reduce the risk of exertional heatstroke. This study analyzed the contribution of six factors to T attained at fatigue in Wistar rats (n = 218) subjected to incremental-speed treadmill running: ambient temperature (T), distance traveled, initial T, body mass, measurement site, and heat loss index (HLI). First, we ran hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses with data from different studies conducted in our laboratory (n = 353 recordings). We observed that T, distance traveled, initial T, and measurement site were the variables with predictive power. Next, regression analyses were conducted with data for each of the following T indices: abdominal (T), brain cortex (T), or colonic (T) temperature. Our findings indicated that T, distance traveled (i.e., an exercise performance-related variable), initial T, and HLI predicted the three T indices at fatigue. Most intriguingly, HLI was inversely related to T and T but positively associated with T. Lastly, we compared the temperature values at fatigue among these T indices, and the following descendent order was noticed - T, T, and T - irrespective of T where experiments were conducted. In conclusion, T in rats exercised to fatigue depends primarily on environmental conditions, performance, pre-exercise T, and measurement site. Moreover, the influence of cutaneous heat loss on T is qualitatively different from the influence on T and T, and the temperature values at fatigue are not homogenous within the body core.
了解体育锻炼引起身体核心温度(T)升高的潜在因素,对于制定应对高温疲劳和降低运动性中暑风险的策略至关重要。本研究分析了六个因素对Wistar大鼠(n = 218)进行递增速度跑步机跑步至疲劳时所达到的T的贡献:环境温度(T)、行进距离、初始T、体重、测量部位和热损失指数(HLI)。首先,我们对在我们实验室进行的不同研究的数据(n = 353次记录)进行了分层多元线性回归分析。我们观察到T、行进距离、初始T和测量部位是具有预测能力的变量。接下来,对以下每个T指数的数据进行了回归分析:腹部(T)、大脑皮层(T)或结肠(T)温度。我们的研究结果表明,T、行进距离(即与运动表现相关的变量)、初始T和HLI可预测疲劳时的三个T指数。最有趣的是,HLI与T和T呈负相关,但与T呈正相关。最后,我们比较了这些T指数在疲劳时的温度值,发现以下降序顺序——T、T和T——与进行实验的T无关。总之,运动至疲劳的大鼠的T主要取决于环境条件、运动表现、运动前的T和测量部位。此外,皮肤散热对T的影响在性质上不同于对T和T的影响,并且身体核心内疲劳时的温度值并不均匀。