Moshari Amirhosein, Aslani Alireza, Entezari Ashkan, Ghanbari Kasra
Renewable Energy and Environment Department, University of Tehran, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(22):62281-62294. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26244-6. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
A lack of resources and suitable farming lands, climate change, and a rapidly growing population are some of the main concerns of the societies that pose security challenges to the governments. Creating controlled environments for cultivation, growing plants, and farming, such as greenhouses, may assist in overcoming these challenges. Greenhouses can significantly increase land use efficiency in agriculture by increasing crop yield and harvesting throughout the year, which has long been proven effective. The history of greenhouses for farming dates back to Roman times, and there are different barriers to their applications. An example is the provision of energy to control the cultivation conditions of plants in greenhouses, particularly for heating and cooling hot and cold climate areas. On the other hand, based on the global energy trend, decentralized energy production based on solar energy is highly regarded. In the same way, that households can harvest solar energy, greenhouses can also benefit from solar energy. However, because greenhouses need sunlight to cultivate plants, reducing sunlight using common photovoltaic panels is not logical. By incorporating semitransparent solar cells into these greenhouses, the issue of reduced sunlight could be addressed, and further efficiency gains could be achieved by reducing energy demand in these greenhouses. This research investigates the energy supply system's integration with greenhouses consumption. First, we assess different conventional types of greenhouses in terms of energy demand. Then, we investigate the energy demand with organic photovoltaic (OPV) integration for each type. Finally, the best design of the greenhouse for OPV integration is recommended. Results show that flat arch geometry is the best choice for dry and cold climates, while sawtooth geometry showed better improvements in tropical climates. In both temperate/mesothermal and continental/microthermal climates, A-frame geometry showed superiority in energy saving. Simulations revealed an annual electricity generation for a unit floor area of the greenhouses to be 173.7 kWh/m to 247.9 MWh/m for the optimum structural geometries that decrease the energy consumption of greenhouses. Additionally, the results show that the installation of the OPV can decrease energy consumption from 15 to 58% based on the greenhouse's location and structural geometry.
资源和适宜耕地的匮乏、气候变化以及人口的快速增长是给政府带来安全挑战的社会所面临的一些主要问题。创建用于种植、培育植物和耕作的可控环境,如温室,可能有助于克服这些挑战。温室可以通过提高作物产量和实现全年收获来显著提高农业土地利用效率,这早已被证明是有效的。用于耕作的温室历史可以追溯到罗马时代,其应用存在不同的障碍。一个例子是提供能源来控制温室内植物的种植条件,特别是在炎热和寒冷气候地区的加热和冷却。另一方面,基于全球能源趋势,基于太阳能的分散式能源生产备受推崇。同样,家庭可以收获太阳能,温室也可以从太阳能中受益。然而,由于温室需要阳光来种植植物,使用普通光伏板减少阳光照射是不合理的。通过将半透明太阳能电池集成到这些温室中,可以解决阳光减少的问题,并且通过降低这些温室的能源需求可以进一步提高效率。本研究调查能源供应系统与温室消耗的整合。首先,我们根据能源需求评估不同类型的传统温室。然后,我们研究每种类型与有机光伏(OPV)集成后的能源需求。最后,推荐用于OPV集成的温室最佳设计。结果表明,平拱几何形状是干燥寒冷气候的最佳选择,而锯齿形几何形状在热带气候中显示出更好的改善。在温带/中温气候和大陆/微温气候中,A形几何形状在节能方面表现出优势。模拟显示,对于降低温室能耗的最佳结构几何形状,温室单位建筑面积的年发电量为173.7千瓦时/平方米至247.9兆瓦时/平方米。此外,结果表明,根据温室的位置和结构几何形状,安装OPV可将能源消耗降低15%至58%。