Suppr超能文献

闭合性颅脑损伤成年患者恢复情况的预测:明尼苏达多相人格调查表、适应行为量表及“生活质量”评定量表的评估

Prediction of recovery for closed-head-injured adults: an evaluation of the MMPI, the Adaptive Behavior Scale, and a "Quality of Life" Rating Scale.

作者信息

Walker D E, Blankenship V, Ditty J A, Lynch K P

机构信息

Oakland University.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1987 Nov;43(6):699-707. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198711)43:6<699::aid-jclp2270430610>3.0.co;2-9.

Abstract

Twenty-five closed-head-injured adults (24 males, 1 female; M age = 28.8 years) were classified as "recovered" if they had returned to work, school, or a sheltered workshop for which pay was received and "non-recovered" if they did not meet these criteria. Current status was compared with MMPI, Adaptive Behavior Scale (ABS), and "Quality of Life" Rating Scale (QLRS) scores at time of entry into a rehabilitation program. The "non-recovered" group was significantly higher on the PD (Psychopathic deviate) scale. No differences were found between groups on the Sc (Schizophrenia) or K (Validity) scales. The "recovered" group was significantly higher on the ABS Economic Activity domain and significantly lower in the Violent & Destructive, Antisocial, Rebelliousness, Untrustworthiness, Stereotyped Behavior & Odd Mannerisms, and Psychological Disturbance behavior domains. The self-ratings (QLRS) of the "nonrecovered" subjects were significantly more distinct from the ratings made by their relatives or significant others than were those of the "recovered" subjects.

摘要

25名闭合性颅脑损伤的成年人(24名男性,1名女性;平均年龄 = 28.8岁),如果他们已重返工作岗位、学校或有报酬的庇护工场,则被归类为“康复”;如果不符合这些标准,则被归类为“未康复”。将当前状况与进入康复项目时的明尼苏达多相人格测验(MMPI)、适应性行为量表(ABS)和“生活质量”评定量表(QLRS)得分进行比较。“未康复”组在精神病态偏差(PD)量表上得分显著更高。两组在精神分裂症(Sc)或效度(K)量表上未发现差异。“康复”组在ABS经济活动领域得分显著更高,而在暴力与破坏、反社会、叛逆、不可信赖、刻板行为与怪异举止以及心理障碍行为领域得分显著更低。“未康复”受试者的自我评定(QLRS)与其亲属或重要他人的评定相比,与“康复”受试者相比差异更为显著。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验