Kuypers Dirk, Weekers Laurent, Blogg Martin, Anaokar Swapneel, Del Pilar Repetur Carola, De Meyer Vicky, Kanaan Nada
Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Transplant Direct. 2023 Mar 15;9(4):e1465. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001465. eCollection 2023 Apr.
Prolonged-release tacrolimus (PRT) may offer improved outcomes after kidney transplantation compared with immediate-release tacrolimus (IRT). However, data on outcomes beyond 5-y posttransplantation are lacking.
A retrospective, noninterventional chart review study examined long-term graft survival in adult kidney transplant participants in the Adherence Measurement in Stable Renal Transplant Patients Following Conversion From Prograf to Advagraf (ADMIRAD) clinical trial at 4 Belgian sites. Patients were randomized to receive once-daily PRT or twice-daily IRT for 6 mo, followed by treatment as per real-world clinical practice. Data were collected retrospectively from randomization day until December 31, 2018. Primary endpoints included efficacy failure, defined as a composite endpoint of graft loss, biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, and graft dysfunction. Secondary endpoints included overall patient survival and course of kidney function.
This analysis included 78.5% of patients from ADMIRAD (n = 108 PRT; n = 64 IRT). The Kaplan-Meier survival rate without efficacy failure from randomization to year 5 was 0.741 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.647, 0.813) for the PRT group (n = 80), and 0.667 (95% CI: 0.536, 0.768) for the IRT group (n = 42) and remained higher for PRT throughout 10 y follow-up ( = 0.041). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival from the time of last transplant was 0.981 (95% CI: 0.928, 0.995) and 0.880 (95% CI: 0.802, 0.928) at 5 and 10 y in the PRT group. Kidney function parameters and tacrolimus trough levels remained stable over the follow-up period.
Patients in the ADMIRAD study who received PRT for up to 10 y had improved long-term outcomes compared with patients receiving IRT, with a consistent effect on both graft and patient survival.
与速释他克莫司(IRT)相比,肾移植后使用缓释他克莫司(PRT)可能会带来更好的结果。然而,缺乏移植后5年以上的结果数据。
一项回顾性、非干预性图表审查研究,在比利时的4个地点对稳定肾移植患者从普乐可复转换为新山地明后的依从性测量(ADMIRAD)临床试验中的成年肾移植参与者的长期移植物存活情况进行了研究。患者被随机分配接受每日一次的PRT或每日两次的IRT治疗6个月,然后按照实际临床实践进行治疗。数据从随机分组日回顾性收集至2018年12月31日。主要终点包括疗效失败,定义为移植物丢失、活检证实的急性排斥反应和移植物功能障碍的复合终点。次要终点包括患者总体生存率和肾功能进程。
该分析纳入了ADMIRAD研究中78.5%的患者(PRT组n = 108;IRT组n = 64)。PRT组(n = 80)从随机分组到第5年无疗效失败的Kaplan-Meier生存率为0.741(95%置信区间[CI]:0.647,0.813),IRT组(n = 42)为0.667(95%CI:0.536,0.768),在整个10年随访期间PRT组的生存率一直较高(P = 0.041)。PRT组在第5年和第10年从最后一次移植时起的总体生存Kaplan-Meier估计值分别为0.981(95%CI:0.928,0.995)和0.880(95%CI:0.802,0.928)。随访期间肾功能参数和他克莫司谷浓度保持稳定。
与接受IRT的患者相比,ADMIRAD研究中接受PRT长达10年的患者长期结局得到改善,对移植物和患者生存均有一致影响。