关于卢里亚失语症命名障碍中提示假设的一项调查。

An investigation of Luria's hypothesis on prompting in aphasic naming disturbances.

作者信息

Li E C, Canter G J

机构信息

Department of Speech Communication, California State University, Fullerton 92634.

出版信息

J Commun Disord. 1987 Dec;20(6):469-75. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(87)90034-7.

DOI:10.1016/0021-9924(87)90034-7

PMID:3693592

Abstract

This study investigated Luria's hypothesis that aphasic subgroups would respond differentially to phonemic prompts. Responsiveness to initial-sound cues was examined in 40 aphasics--10 Broca's, conduction, Wernicke's, and anomic aphasics who had naming difficulties. Results, with the exception of the anomic aphasic group, supported Luria's predictions. Broca's aphasics were responsive to phonemic cueing, while Wernicke's aphasics were not. Conduction aphasics tended to respond in a fashion similar to the Wernicke's group. The relationship of cueing responsiveness to underlying naming mechanisms is discussed.

摘要

本研究调查了鲁利亚的假说，即失语症亚组对音素提示会有不同反应。对40名失语症患者进行了对首音线索反应性的检查，其中包括10名布罗卡失语症患者、传导性失语症患者、韦尼克失语症患者以及存在命名困难的命名性失语症患者。结果除命名性失语症组外，均支持鲁利亚的预测。布罗卡失语症患者对音素提示有反应，而韦尼克失语症患者则无反应。传导性失语症患者的反应方式往往与韦尼克失语症组相似。文中还讨论了提示反应性与潜在命名机制的关系。