• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing Patient's Values When Selecting Treatments for Alopecia Areata: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.斑秃治疗选择中患者价值观评估:一项横断面调查研究
Skin Appendage Disord. 2023 Mar;9(2):99-103. doi: 10.1159/000527251. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
2
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Patients with Alopecia Areata: A Survey Study in the USA.斑秃患者的创伤后应激障碍:美国的一项调查研究
Skin Appendage Disord. 2023 Oct;9(5):342-345. doi: 10.1159/000530356. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
3
Shared Decision-Making, Therapeutic Choice, and Decisional Regret in Patients With Alopecia Areata.斑秃患者的共同决策、治疗选择和决策后悔。
JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Oct 1;158(10):1187-1191. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.3025.
4
Utilization of Mental Health Resources and Complementary and Alternative Therapies for Alopecia Areata: A U.S. Survey.斑秃患者心理健康资源及补充与替代疗法的利用情况:一项美国调查
Int J Trichology. 2017 Oct-Dec;9(4):160-164. doi: 10.4103/ijt.ijt_53_17.
5
Evaluating the sources and types of dietary and nutritional advice for patients with alopecia areata.评估斑秃患者饮食和营养建议的来源和类型。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 May 25;316(6):283. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-02940-2.
6
Cannabis Use among Patients with Alopecia Areata: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.斑秃患者的大麻使用情况:一项横断面调查研究。
Int J Trichology. 2022 Jan-Feb;14(1):21-24. doi: 10.4103/ijt.ijt_96_21. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
7
Childhood Alopecia Areata: An Overview of Treatment and Recent Patents.儿童斑秃:治疗概述及近期专利。
Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov. 2020;14(2):117-132. doi: 10.2174/1872213X14999200728145822.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Hair Regrowth Outcomes of Contact Immunotherapy for Patients With Alopecia Areata: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.接触免疫疗法治疗斑秃患者的毛发再生结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Oct 1;154(10):1145-1151. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2312.
10
Is methotrexate an effective and safe treatment for maintaining hair regrowth in people with alopecia totalis? A Critically Appraised Topic.甲氨蝶呤治疗全秃患者维持毛发生长是否有效且安全?一项批判性评价课题。
Br J Dermatol. 2018 Sep;179(3):609-614. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16796. Epub 2018 Jul 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Shared Decision-Making, Therapeutic Choice, and Decisional Regret in Patients With Alopecia Areata.斑秃患者的共同决策、治疗选择和决策后悔。
JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Oct 1;158(10):1187-1191. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.3025.
2
A Large Cross-Sectional Survey Study of the Prevalence of Alopecia Areata in the United States.美国斑秃患病率的大型横断面调查研究
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2020 Apr 1;13:259-266. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S245649. eCollection 2020.
3
Alopecia areata: An appraisal of new treatment approaches and overview of current therapies.斑秃:新治疗方法的评估及现有疗法概述。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Jan;78(1):15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.04.1142.
4
Utilization of Mental Health Resources and Complementary and Alternative Therapies for Alopecia Areata: A U.S. Survey.斑秃患者心理健康资源及补充与替代疗法的利用情况:一项美国调查
Int J Trichology. 2017 Oct-Dec;9(4):160-164. doi: 10.4103/ijt.ijt_53_17.

斑秃治疗选择中患者价值观评估:一项横断面调查研究

Assessing Patient's Values When Selecting Treatments for Alopecia Areata: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

作者信息

Drake Lara, Han Jane, Reyes-Hadsall Sophia, Mostaghimi Arash, Huang Kathie

机构信息

Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Skin Appendage Disord. 2023 Mar;9(2):99-103. doi: 10.1159/000527251. Epub 2022 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1159/000527251
PMID:36937159
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10015646/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune condition that results in nonscarring hair loss. There is currently only one Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for AA; as a result, a wide range of treatments are commonly administered. This study aimed to determine how patients with AA prioritize treatment characteristics when choosing a therapy.

METHODS

A cross-sectional national survey was distributed using the National Alopecia Areata Foundation's (NAAF) email list. This study was approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board. Participants were asked to rank the importance of five treatment domains.

RESULTS

Of the 1,074 completed surveys (completion rate 77.4%), most respondents were female (85.4%) and white (77.8%) with an average age of 49.3 ± 15.4 years. Respondents had AA for an average of 17.7 ± 15.4 years, with 90.0% experiencing current active hair loss. 95.6% of respondents considered the treatment's ability to achieve hair regrowth as important, 93.9% listed the availability of information about the treatment (e.g., via doctor or online) as important, 89.1% ranked the treatment side effects as important, 75.7% the cost, and 68.0% the convenience of use. A sub-analysis was performed examining responses between respondents who identify as white versus nonwhite, which showed that while the order of importance was the same between groups, a significantly larger proportion of nonwhite respondents attributed higher importance to cost (white: 73.8%, nonwhite: 82.4%; = 0.006) and convenience (white: 65.3%, nonwhite: 77.3%; < 0.001) than their white counterparts.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: These findings identify key domains that can serve as a starting point in shared decision-making between patients and physicians. This knowledge can streamline dermatologist delivery of key information and highlight areas of improvement for future therapeutics. Limitations include the nonrandomized NAAF population with most participants being white females. Future studies should confirm these findings in other patient populations.

摘要

引言

斑秃(AA)是一种自身免疫性疾病,会导致非瘢痕性脱发。目前美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)仅批准了一种用于治疗斑秃的药物;因此,人们通常会采用多种治疗方法。本研究旨在确定斑秃患者在选择治疗方法时如何对治疗特征进行优先级排序。

方法

使用国家斑秃基金会(NAAF)的电子邮件列表进行了一项全国性横断面调查。本研究获得了麻省总医院布莱根分院机构审查委员会的批准。参与者被要求对五个治疗领域的重要性进行排序。

结果

在1074份完成的调查问卷中(完成率77.4%),大多数受访者为女性(85.4%),白人(77.8%),平均年龄为49.3±15.4岁。受访者患斑秃的平均时间为17.7±15.4年,其中90.0%的人目前正在经历脱发。95.6%的受访者认为治疗方法促进头发生长的能力很重要,93.9%的人认为获得有关治疗方法的信息(例如通过医生或网络)很重要,89.1%的人将治疗副作用列为重要因素,75.7%的人认为成本重要,68.0%的人认为使用便利性重要。对自认为是白人或非白人的受访者的回答进行了亚组分析,结果显示,虽然两组之间重要性的排序相同,但与白人受访者相比,非白人受访者中认为成本(白人:73.8%,非白人:82.4%;P = 0.006)和便利性(白人:65.3%,非白人:77.3%;P < 0.001)更重要的比例明显更高。

讨论/结论:这些发现确定了关键领域,可作为患者与医生共同决策的起点。这些知识可以简化皮肤科医生提供关键信息的过程,并突出未来治疗方法需要改进的领域。局限性包括NAAF的非随机人群,且大多数参与者为白人女性。未来的研究应在其他患者群体中证实这些发现。