Wu Zhao-Min, Wang Peng, Liu Juan, Liu Lu, Cao Xiao-Lan, Sun Li, Yang Li, Cao Qing-Jiu, Wang Yu-Feng, Yang Bin-Rang
Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Cardiac Rehabilitation Center, Fuwai Hospital, CAMS and PUMC, Beijing, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 1;14:1099882. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1099882. eCollection 2023.
There is an ongoing debate about the restrictive inattentive (RI) presentation of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The current study aimed to systematically investigate the clinical, neuropsychological, and brain functional characteristics of children with ADHD restrictive inattentive presentation.
A clinical sample of 789 children with or without ADHD participated in the current study and finished clinical interviews, questionnaires, and neuropsychological tests. Those individuals with a diagnosis of ADHD were further divided into three subgroups according to the presentation of inattentive and/or hyperactive/impulsive symptoms, the ADHD-RI, the ADHD-I (inattentive), and the ADHD-C (combined) groups. Between-group comparisons were carried out on each clinical and neuropsychological measure using ANCOVA, with age and sex as covariates. Bonferroni corrections were applied to correct for multiple comparisons. Two hundred twenty-seven of the subjects also went through resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging scans. Five ADHD-related brain functional networks, including the default mode network (DMN), the dorsal attention network (DAN), the ventral attention network, the executive control network, and the salience network, were built using predefined regions of interest (ROIs). Voxel-based group-wise comparisons were performed.
Compared with healthy controls, all ADHD groups presented more clinical problems and weaker cognitive function. Among the ADHD groups, the ADHD-C group had the most clinical problems, especially delinquent and aggressive behaviors. Regarding cognitive function, the ADHD-RI group displayed the most impaired sustained attention, and the ADHD-C group had the worst response inhibition function. In terms of brain functional connectivity (FC), reduced FC in the DMN was identified in the ADHD-C and the ADHD-I groups but not the ADHD-RI group, compared to the healthy controls. Subjects with ADHD-I also presented decreased FC in the DAN in contrast to the control group. The ADHD-RI displayed marginally significantly lower FC in the salience network compared to the ADHD-I and the control groups.
The ADHD-RI group is distinguishable from the ADHD-I and the ADHD-C groups. It is characterized by fewer externalizing behaviors, worse sustained attention, and better response inhibition function. The absence of abnormally high hyperactive/impulsive symptoms in ADHD-RI might be related to less impaired brain function in DMN, but potentially more impairment in the salience network.
关于注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的限制型注意力不集中(RI)表现存在持续的争论。本研究旨在系统调查患有ADHD限制型注意力不集中表现的儿童的临床、神经心理学和脑功能特征。
789名患有或未患有ADHD的儿童临床样本参与了本研究,并完成了临床访谈、问卷调查和神经心理学测试。那些被诊断为ADHD的个体根据注意力不集中和/或多动/冲动症状的表现进一步分为三个亚组,即ADHD-RI组、ADHD-I(注意力不集中)组和ADHD-C(混合型)组。使用协方差分析(ANCOVA)对每个临床和神经心理学指标进行组间比较,将年龄和性别作为协变量。采用Bonferroni校正来校正多重比较。227名受试者还进行了静息态功能磁共振成像扫描。使用预定义的感兴趣区域(ROI)构建了五个与ADHD相关的脑功能网络,包括默认模式网络(DMN)、背侧注意网络(DAN)、腹侧注意网络、执行控制网络和突显网络。进行基于体素的组间比较。
与健康对照组相比,所有ADHD组都存在更多临床问题且认知功能较弱。在ADHD组中,ADHD-C组临床问题最多,尤其是违法和攻击性行为。在认知功能方面,ADHD-RI组的持续注意力受损最严重,而ADHD-C组的反应抑制功能最差。在脑功能连接(FC)方面,与健康对照组相比,ADHD-C组和ADHD-I组的DMN中FC降低,但ADHD-RI组未出现这种情况。与对照组相比,ADHD-I组受试者的DAN中FC也降低。与ADHD-I组和对照组相比,ADHD-RI组在突显网络中的FC略显著降低。
ADHD-RI组与ADHD-I组和ADHD-C组不同。其特点是外化行为较少、持续注意力较差但反应抑制功能较好。ADHD-RI中不存在异常高的多动/冲动症状可能与DMN中脑功能受损较少有关,但突显网络中可能存在更多损伤。