Suppr超能文献

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版修订版(DSM-5-TR)中关于新冠疫情期间自然死亡、因新冠病毒病(COVID-19)死亡以及非自然死亡后的持续性悲伤障碍水平。

DSM-5-TR prolonged grief disorder levels after natural, COVID-19, and unnatural loss during the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Lenferink L I M, Boelen P A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Health, & Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management, and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Affect Disord Rep. 2023 Apr;12:100516. doi: 10.1016/j.jadr.2023.100516. Epub 2023 Mar 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A rise in prolonged grief disorder (PGD) levels was expected due to COVID-19 deaths. We tested this assumption, by comparing PGD-severity among people who experienced a death of a loved one during the pandemic caused by a natural (e.g., illness), COVID-19, or unnatural (e.g., accidents, suicides, homicides) loss on average 8 months earlier and in a subgroup of people bereaved ≥12 months earlier.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Self-rated DSM-5-TR (acute) PGD levels (using the Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report plus) were compared among Dutch adults who experienced a natural ( = 1036), COVID-19 ( = 76), or unnatural loss ( = 271) during the pandemic. Analyses of covariance were used.

RESULTS

About two-thirds of the participants scored above the cut-off for (acute) probable PGD. Significantly higher acute PGD-severity was found in people after unnatural loss compared with COVID-19 ( = -2.44 (SE=0.87),  = .005) or natural loss ( = -1.78 (SE=0.45), <.001). No significant differences in acute PGD-severity was found between people who experienced a natural or COVID-19 loss ( = 0.66 (SE=0.80),  = .413). PGD levels did not differ between the three groups for people who lost their loved one ≥12 months earlier ( = 380).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that acute PGD-severity was significantly higher following unnatural deaths than after COVID-19 deaths or natural causes, but no differences were found for people who experienced a loss ≥12 months earlier.

摘要

背景与目的

由于新冠疫情导致的死亡人数增加,预计长期悲伤障碍(PGD)的发病率会上升。我们通过比较在疫情期间平均8个月前经历亲人自然死亡(如疾病)、新冠死亡或非自然死亡(如事故、自杀、他杀)的人群以及早于12个月前失去亲人的亚组人群的PGD严重程度,来验证这一假设。

设计与方法

比较荷兰成年人在疫情期间经历自然死亡(n = 1036)、新冠死亡(n = 76)或非自然死亡(n = 271)后的自我评定DSM-5-TR(急性)PGD水平(使用创伤性悲伤量表-自我报告加项)。采用协方差分析。

结果

约三分之二的参与者得分高于(急性)可能的PGD临界值。与新冠死亡(β = -2.44(标准误 = 0.87),p = 0.005)或自然死亡(β = -1.78(标准误 = 0.45),p < 0.001)相比,非自然死亡后的人群急性PGD严重程度显著更高。经历自然死亡或新冠死亡的人群在急性PGD严重程度上没有显著差异(β = 0.66(标准误 = 0.80),p = 0.413)。对于早于12个月前失去亲人的人群(n = 380),三组之间的PGD水平没有差异。

结论

我们发现,非自然死亡后的急性PGD严重程度显著高于新冠死亡或自然原因导致的死亡,但对于早于12个月前经历丧亲之痛的人群,未发现差异。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

8
Grief Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multiple Group Comparisons.疫情前和疫情期间的悲伤:多群组比较。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Dec;60(6):e1-e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Oct 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验