UPenn/Rutgers Tobacco Center for Regulatory Science, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Health Commun. 2023 Mar 4;28(3):182-189. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2023.2192013. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
As concerns about the effects of health misinformation rise, understanding why misbeliefs are accepted is increasingly important. People believe repeated statements more than novel statements, an effect known as truth by repetition, however this has not been examined in the context of tobacco information. Misbeliefs about tobacco are rampant and novel facts about tobacco are viewed as less believable. This paper examines how repetition of true and false tobacco statements affects truth perceptions. We recruited an online sample of 1,436 U.S. adults in May 2021. In an exposure phase, each participant rated their interest in 30 randomly selected statements about tobacco products and general knowledge trivia, half of them true and half false. The study had a two (tobacco product) by two (familiarity of statement claim) between-subjects design and a two (statement truth) by two (statement repetition) within-subjects design. During the testing phase participants rated the truthfulness of 24 repeated statements and 24 unseen statements. Repetition of true and false tobacco statements increased their subjective truth (diff=.20, < .001), and the effect was larger for false claims compared to true claims. This underscores the importance of strategies to inoculate people against misinformation and calls for interventions that can stop the repetition of newly generated false claims.
随着人们对健康错误信息影响的担忧加剧,了解为什么人们会接受错误信念变得越来越重要。人们更倾向于相信被重复的陈述,而不是新颖的陈述,这种效应被称为重复的真理效应。然而,这种效应在烟草信息的背景下尚未得到检验。关于烟草的错误信念比比皆是,而关于烟草的新事实则被认为不太可信。本文研究了重复真实和虚假的烟草陈述如何影响人们对真理的感知。我们于 2021 年 5 月在线招募了 1436 名美国成年人。在暴露阶段,每个参与者都要对 30 个随机选择的关于烟草产品和常识琐事的陈述的兴趣进行评级,其中一半是真实的,一半是虚假的。该研究采用了两(烟草制品)乘两(陈述的熟悉程度)的被试间设计和两(陈述的真实性)乘两(陈述的重复次数)的被试内设计。在测试阶段,参与者对 24 个重复陈述和 24 个未见过的陈述进行了真实性评级。真实和虚假的烟草陈述的重复增加了它们的主观真实性(差异=.20,<0.001),并且与真实陈述相比,虚假陈述的效果更大。这突显出人们对错误信息进行免疫接种的策略的重要性,并呼吁采取干预措施,以阻止新产生的虚假陈述的重复。