Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
USDA - Agricultural Research Service, Pest Management Research Unit, Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory, Sidney, MT 59270, USA.
J Econ Entomol. 2023 Jun 13;116(3):674-685. doi: 10.1093/jee/toad044.
Due to a lack of knowledge on the pollination requirements of kiwifruit cultivars grown within the United States, farmers simultaneously implement multiple pollination methods, like the rental of managed bee species or artificial pollination to achieve high fruit yields. However, implementing multiple pollination methods is costly and possibly an inefficient use of resources. We assessed the contribution of two managed bees (Apis mellifera and Bombus impatiens) to the pollination of kiwifruit by i) determining the relative abundance of kiwifruit pollen collected by foragers of each bee species, and ii) comparing fruit set and fruit quality among insect and artificially pollinated flowers through an insect exclusion experiment. A significant difference was observed between the mean relative abundance of kiwifruit pollen carried in the corbicula of A. mellifera and B. impatiens, with B. impatiens carrying on average 46% more kiwifruit pollen than A. mellifera. Artificially pollinated kiwifruit flowers set significantly greater numbers of fruit per flower at four weeks post-bloom and at harvest compared to insect pollination, wind pollination, and pollen exclusion treatment. Artificial pollination produced fruits of greater weight, size, and seed number compared to insect-pollinated flowers, and few fruits were produced in the pollen exclusion and wind pollination treatments. Kiwifruit producers experiencing similar conditions to ours should focus on artificially pollinating their crops rather than relying on managed or wild insects for kiwifruit pollination. Future research should evaluate other methods of artificial pollination to determine their effectiveness, efficiency, and economics in the pollination of kiwifruit grown within the United States.
由于对美国种植的猕猴桃品种的授粉需求缺乏了解,农民同时采用多种授粉方法,如租用管理蜜蜂物种或人工授粉来实现高水果产量。然而,实施多种授粉方法成本高昂,并且可能对资源的利用效率不高。我们通过以下两种方法来评估两种管理蜜蜂(Apis mellifera 和 Bombus impatiens)对猕猴桃授粉的贡献:i)确定每种蜜蜂采集者采集的猕猴桃花粉的相对丰度,ii)通过昆虫排除实验比较昆虫和人工授粉花朵的结实率和果实品质。在 Apis mellifera 和 Bombus impatiens 的采集器中携带的猕猴桃花粉的相对丰度之间观察到显著差异,B. impatiens 携带的猕猴桃花粉平均比 A. mellifera 多 46%。与昆虫授粉、风授粉和花粉排除处理相比,人工授粉的猕猴桃花朵在开花后四周和收获时每朵花结出的果实数量明显更多。与昆虫授粉的花朵相比,人工授粉产生的果实重量更大、尺寸更大、种子数量更多,而在花粉排除和风授粉处理中很少产生果实。在美国种植猕猴桃的果农在类似的条件下,应该专注于人工授粉他们的作物,而不是依赖管理或野生昆虫进行猕猴桃授粉。未来的研究应该评估其他人工授粉方法,以确定它们在美国种植的猕猴桃授粉中的有效性、效率和经济性。