Suppr超能文献

机械牵引联合物理疗法治疗腰痛的效果?系统评价与荟萃分析。

The effects of the addition of mechanical traction to physical therapy on low back pain? A systematic review with meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Department of Rehabilitation Science, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, USA.

出版信息

Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2023 Jan;57(1):3-16. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2023.21323.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the comparative effects of different types or parameters of lumbar traction in low back pain (LBP).

METHODS

CENTRAL, CINAHL, ISI Web of Science, PEDro, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched from their inception to March 31, 2021. We considered all RCTs comparing different types or parameters of lumbar traction on adults who complained of LBP with or without lumbar radiculopathy (LR). Any restriction regarding publication time or language was applied. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, performed the quality assessment, and extracted the results. Meta-analysis employed a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis, and five were pooled. Meta-analyses of results from five studies on LBP with LR showed no significant difference between diverse tractions modalities at short-term follow-up. Very low to low-quality evidence supports these results. High-force and low-force traction demonstrated clinically significant improvements in pain.

CONCLUSION

The literature suggests the short-term effectiveness of traction on pain in LBP with LR, regardless of the type or the dosage employed. Different effects of traction other the mechanical ones can be hypothesized. This systematic review may be relevant for clinical practice due to the similar effects of different traction types or dosages.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, Therapeutic Study.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在对不同类型或参数的腰椎牵引治疗腰痛(LBP)的随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价和荟萃分析。

方法

从建库到 2021 年 3 月 31 日,我们在 CENTRAL、CINAHL、ISI Web of Science、PEDro、PubMed 和 Scopus 数据库中进行了检索。我们考虑了所有比较成人腰痛(伴或不伴腰椎根性病变)不同类型或参数的腰椎牵引的 RCT。未对发表时间或语言进行任何限制。两名评审员独立选择研究、进行质量评估并提取结果。荟萃分析采用随机效应模型。

结果

有 16 项研究符合定性分析的纳入标准,其中 5 项被纳入汇总分析。五项关于伴腰椎根性病变腰痛的研究结果的荟萃分析表明,短期随访时,各种牵引方式之间没有显著差异。极低至低质量证据支持这些结果。高力和低力牵引在疼痛方面显示出有临床意义的改善。

结论

文献表明,无论采用何种类型或剂量,牵引对伴腰椎根性病变腰痛的疼痛均具有短期疗效。可以假设牵引的其他机械以外的效果不同。由于不同牵引类型或剂量的效果相似,本系统评价可能与临床实践相关。

证据水平

I 级,治疗性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1f9/10151852/dcffd4a44a46/aott-57-1-3_f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验