Suppr超能文献

人工耳蜗植入术在脑室腹腔分流术后患者中的应用方法。

Approach to Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun;168(6):1485-1493. doi: 10.1002/ohn.220. Epub 2023 Jan 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts to inform clinical practice.

STUDY DESIGN

Historical cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral centers.

METHODS

A multi-institutional historical cohort of patients with VP shunts and CI was identified and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 46 patients (median age 8 years [interquratile range, IQR: 2-46]) with VP shunts and CI were identified. Of these, 41 (89%) patients had a VP shunt prior to CI. Based on institutional preference and individual patient factors, CI was performed contralateral to a pre-existing VP shunt in 24 of these 41 cases (59%) and ipsilateral in 17 (41%). Furthermore, pre-CI relocation of the VP shunt was performed in 3 cases (7%), and 2 patients (5%) underwent planned revision of their VP shunt concurrent with CI. In total, 2 of 27 pediatric patients (7%) required unanticipated revision shunt surgery, both contralateral to CI device placement, given VP shunt malfunction. One of 19 adult patients (5%) required shunt revision during CI due to shunt damage noted intraoperatively. Among 43 patients with available follow-up, 38 (88%) are regular CI users, with a median consonant-nucleus vowel-consonant word: score of 58% (IQR: 28-72).

CONCLUSION

CI can be performed at low risk, either contralateral or ipsilateral, to a VP shunt, and does not mandate shunt revision in most cases. Additional considerations regarding CI receiver-stimulator placement are necessary with programmable shunts to mitigate device interaction. Preoperative planning, including coordination of care with neurosurgery, is important to achieving optimal outcomes.

摘要

目的

评估伴有脑室-腹腔(VP)分流管的患者行人工耳蜗植入(CI)的安全性和效果,为临床实践提供参考依据。

研究设计

历史性队列研究。

设置

三级转诊中心。

方法

确定并分析了一个伴有 VP 分流管和 CI 的多机构历史性队列患者。

结果

共确定了 46 例(中位年龄 8 岁[四分位距,IQR:2-46])伴有 VP 分流管和 CI 的患者。其中,41 例(89%)患者在 CI 前就有 VP 分流管。根据机构偏好和个体患者因素,24 例(59%)同侧植入 CI,41 例(41%)对侧植入 CI。此外,3 例(7%)在 CI 前对 VP 分流管进行了重新定位,2 例(5%)同时计划对 VP 分流管进行修复。共有 2 例(7%)儿童患者(27 例中的 2 例)需要进行意外的分流管手术,这 2 例均为 CI 装置放置的对侧,VP 分流管功能障碍。1 例(5%)成人患者(19 例中的 1 例)在 CI 期间因术中发现分流管损坏而需要分流管修复。在 43 例有随访信息的患者中,38 例(88%)为常规 CI 用户,其辅音-核元音-辅音词得分中位数为 58%(IQR:28-72)。

结论

VP 分流管对侧或同侧行 CI 风险低,大多数情况下无需进行分流管修复。对于具有可程控分流管的患者,需要考虑 CI 接收器-刺激器的放置位置,以减轻设备间的相互作用。术前计划,包括与神经外科的协调,对获得最佳效果很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验