• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

镜像数字激活数量表征,但不显示SNARC效应:一种工作记忆解释。

Mirror numbers activate quantity representations, but show no SNARC effect: A working memory explanation.

作者信息

Marzola Gianluca, Cohen Dale J

机构信息

Department of Philosophy and Communication, University of Bologna.

Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Wilmington.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Apr;49(4):465-482. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001090. Epub 2023 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1037/xhp0001090
PMID:36939612
Abstract

The Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Code (SNARC) effect refers to the finding that people respond to small numbers faster with the left hand and to large numbers faster with the right hand. This effect is often explained by hypothesizing that the mental representation of quantities has a spatial component: left to right in ascending order (Mental Number Line). Here we assess the relation between quantity and spatial representation by investigating mirror numbers. Although mirror numbers denote quantity, they are not generally encountered in a left-to-right spatial organization. In Experiments 1 and 2, we assessed whether numerical distance and SNARC effects were present for both mirror and normal numbers when participants were required to process semantic information in a magnitude classification task. In Experiment 3, we assessed whether the SNARC effect was present for both mirror and normal numbers when participants were not required to process semantic information in a mirror judgment task. Results show that participants access the quantity of both normal and mirror numbers, but only normal numbers are spatially organized from left to right. In addition, we show that the physical similarity between numbers successfully predicted the performance of participants. We concluded that the Working Memory account of the SNARC effect best explains our data. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

反应编码的空间数字关联(SNARC)效应是指这样一个发现:人们用左手对小数的反应更快,用右手对大数的反应更快。这种效应通常通过假设数量的心理表征具有空间成分来解释:按升序从左到右(心理数字线)。在这里,我们通过研究镜像数字来评估数量与空间表征之间的关系。虽然镜像数字表示数量,但它们在从左到右的空间组织中并不常见。在实验1和实验2中,当要求参与者在大小分类任务中处理语义信息时,我们评估了镜像数字和普通数字是否存在数字距离和SNARC效应。在实验3中,当要求参与者在镜像判断任务中不处理语义信息时,我们评估了镜像数字和普通数字是否存在SNARC效应。结果表明,参与者能够获取普通数字和镜像数字的数量,但只有普通数字是从左到右进行空间组织的。此外,我们表明数字之间的物理相似性成功地预测了参与者的表现。我们得出结论,SNARC效应的工作记忆解释最能解释我们的数据。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Mirror numbers activate quantity representations, but show no SNARC effect: A working memory explanation.镜像数字激活数量表征,但不显示SNARC效应:一种工作记忆解释。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Apr;49(4):465-482. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001090. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
2
Automaticity of access to numerical magnitude and its spatial associations: The role of task and number representation.获取数字大小及其空间关联的自动性:任务与数字表征的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Feb;45(2):333-348. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000590. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
3
The influence of semantic processing and response latency on the SNARC effect.语义加工和反应潜伏期对SNARC效应的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 May;196:75-86. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
4
Repetition and the SNARC effect with one- and two-digit numbers.一位数和两位数的重复与SNARC效应
Can J Exp Psychol. 2011 Jun;65(2):84-97. doi: 10.1037/a0022368.
5
Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.数量和空间映射向奇偶判断 SNARC 效应的转移。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Nov;35(6):1506-21. doi: 10.1037/a0017257.
6
On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.关于健康人类数字表征与空间注意力交互作用的不稳定性和制约因素:文献综述及新实验证据简述
Prog Brain Res. 2016;227:223-56. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.04.023. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
7
A working memory account of the interaction between numbers and spatial attention.数字与空间注意力交互作用的工作记忆模型
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(8):1500-13. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.903984. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
8
Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.极性对应上的好坏约束解释了反应编码的空间-数字关联效应(SNARC)和反应编码的标记性关联效应(MARC)。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(3):482-94. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1055283. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
9
Does the spatial-numerical association of response codes effect depend on digits' relative or absolute magnitude? Evidence from a perceptual orientation judgment task.反应编码的空间-数字关联效应是否取决于数字的相对大小或绝对大小?来自知觉方向判断任务的证据。
J Gen Psychol. 2018 Oct-Dec;145(4):415-430. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2018.1532391. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
10
Perceiving numbers does not cause automatic shifts of spatial attention.感知数字不会引起空间注意力的自动转移。
Cortex. 2015 Dec;73:298-316. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Sep 28.