Suppr超能文献

双能量CT血管造影术在急性非静脉曲张性胃肠道出血评估中的应用:与数字减影血管造影术的比较

Utility of dual energy CT angiography in the evaluation of acute non-variceal gastrointestinal hemorrhage: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.

作者信息

Agarwal Ayushi, Kumar Korukanti Pradeep, Madhusudhan Kumble Seetharama

机构信息

Department of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Jun;48(6):1880-1890. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-03864-7. Epub 2023 Mar 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the utility of dual energy CT angiography (DECTA) in acute non-variceal gastrointestinal hemorrhage (ANVGIH) compared to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as gold standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

111 Patients (mean age: 39.2 years; 94 males) of ANVGIH who underwent both DECTA and DSA between January 2016 and September 2021 were included. Virtual monochromatic (VM) images at 10 keV increments from 40 to 70 keV and blended (120kVp equivalent) images of arterial phase of DECTA were evaluated independently by two readers blinded to DSA information. Quantitative analysis included measurement of attenuation in the major arteries (abdominal aorta, celiac artery, superior mesenteric artery), suspected vascular lesion, and lesion feeding artery to calculate contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Qualitative analysis assessed the image quality of each data set using a 3-point Likert scale. Findings on DSA were evaluated by a third reader and both DECTA and DSA were compared.

RESULTS

On linear blended images, vascular lesion was identified by reader 1 in 88 (79.3%) and by reader 2 in 87 (78.4%) patients and DSA showed lesion in 92 (82.9%) patients. The sensitivity and specificity of blended images and VM images of DECTA for lesion detection were not significantly different from each other. The CNR and SNR of arteries, vascular lesion and feeding artery were significantly higher at 70 keV (p < 0.005) compared to blended and other VM images. Although subjective scores for image quality were higher for 60 keV images by both readers, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.3). The interobserver agreement was mostly good.

CONCLUSION

In the assessment of ANVGIH, the 60 keV and 70 keV VM images improved the image quality and contrast, respectively, but there was no increase in diagnostic accuracy of VM image datasets compared to linearly blended images. Hence, the diagnostic utility of DECTA in ANVGIH is still uncertain.

摘要

目的

与作为金标准的数字减影血管造影(DSA)相比,评估双能CT血管造影(DECTA)在急性非静脉曲张性胃肠道出血(ANVGIH)中的应用价值。

材料与方法

纳入2016年1月至2021年9月期间接受DECTA和DSA检查的111例ANVGIH患者(平均年龄:39.2岁;男性94例)。由两名对DSA信息不知情的阅片者独立评估DECTA动脉期从40keV到70keV以10keV递增的虚拟单色(VM)图像以及混合(120kVp等效)图像。定量分析包括测量主要动脉(腹主动脉、腹腔干、肠系膜上动脉)、疑似血管病变以及病变供血动脉的衰减,以计算对比噪声比(CNR)和信噪比(SNR)。定性分析使用3级李克特量表评估每个数据集的图像质量。由第三位阅片者评估DSA的结果,并对DECTA和DSA进行比较。

结果

在线性混合图像上,阅片者1在88例(79.3%)患者中识别出血管病变,阅片者2在87例(78.4%)患者中识别出血管病变,DSA显示92例(82.9%)患者存在病变。DECTA的混合图像和VM图像在病变检测方面的敏感性和特异性彼此无显著差异。与混合图像和其他VM图像相比,70keV时动脉、血管病变和供血动脉的CNR和SNR显著更高(p<0.005)。尽管两位阅片者对60keV图像的主观图像质量评分更高,但差异无统计学意义(p=0.3)。观察者间一致性大多良好。

结论

在ANVGIH评估中,60keV和70keV的VM图像分别改善了图像质量和对比度,但与线性混合图像相比,VM图像数据集的诊断准确性并未提高。因此,DECTA在ANVGIH中的诊断效用仍不确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验