Reck Martin, Popat Sanjay, Grohé Christian, Corral Jesus, Novello Silvia, Gottfried Maya, Brueckl Wolfgang, Radonjic Dejan, Kaiser Rolf, Heymach John
Department of Thoracic Oncology, Airway Research Center North (ARCN) Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), LungenClinic, Großhansdorf, Germany.
Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Lung Cancer. 2023 May;179:107173. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.03.009. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
The implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), with or without chemotherapy, as first-line treatment for patients who do not have actionable mutations has proved to be a major paradigm shift in the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the transition of ICIs, such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab, to a first-line setting has left an unmet need for effective second-line treatment options, which is an area of intense research. In 2020, we reviewed the biological and mechanistic rationale for anti-angiogenic agents in combination with, or following, immunotherapy with the aim of eliciting a so called 'angio-immunogenic' switch in the tumor microenvironment. Here, we review the latest clinical evidence of the benefits of incorporating anti-angiogenic agents into treatment regimens. While there is a paucity of prospective data, several recent observational studies indicate that the marketed anti-angiogenic drugs, nintedanib or ramucirumab, are effective in combination with docetaxel following immuno-chemotherapy. Addition of anti-angiogenics, like bevacizumab, have also demonstrated clinical benefit when combined with first-line immuno-chemotherapy regimens. Ongoing clinical trials are assessing these agents in combination with ICIs, with encouraging early results (e.g., ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab in LUNG-MAP S1800A). Also, several emerging anti-angiogenic agents combined with ICIs are currently being assessed in phase III trials following immunotherapy, including lenvatinib (LEAP-008), and sitravatinib (SAPPHIRE) It is hoped that these trials will help expand second-line treatment options in patients with NSCLC. Areas of focus in the future will include further molecular dissection of the mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy and the various response-progression profiles to immunotherapy observed in the clinic and the monitoring of the dynamics of immunomodulation over the course of treatment. Improved understanding of these phenomena may help identify clinical biomarkers and inform the optimal use of anti-angiogenics in the treatment of individual patients.
对于没有可操作突变的患者,免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)联合或不联合化疗作为一线治疗方案,已被证明是晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)治疗管理中的一个重大范式转变。然而,帕博利珠单抗和纳武利尤单抗等ICI向一线治疗的转变,使得对有效的二线治疗方案产生了未满足的需求,这是一个正在深入研究的领域。2020年,我们回顾了抗血管生成药物与免疫治疗联合或序贯使用的生物学和机制原理,目的是在肿瘤微环境中引发所谓的“血管免疫原性”转变。在此,我们回顾了将抗血管生成药物纳入治疗方案的益处的最新临床证据。虽然前瞻性数据较少,但最近的几项观察性研究表明,已上市的抗血管生成药物,如尼达尼布或雷莫西尤单抗,在免疫化疗后与多西他赛联合使用是有效的。添加抗血管生成药物,如贝伐单抗,与一线免疫化疗方案联合使用时也已证明具有临床益处。正在进行的临床试验正在评估这些药物与ICI联合使用的情况,早期结果令人鼓舞(例如,雷莫西尤单抗联合帕博利珠单抗用于LUNG-MAP S1800A研究)。此外,几种新兴的抗血管生成药物与ICI联合使用目前正在免疫治疗后的III期试验中进行评估,包括乐伐替尼(LEAP-008)和西曲替尼(SAPPHIRE)。希望这些试验将有助于扩大NSCLC患者的二线治疗选择。未来的重点领域将包括进一步从分子层面剖析免疫治疗耐药机制以及临床上观察到的免疫治疗的各种反应-进展情况,以及在治疗过程中监测免疫调节的动态变化。对这些现象的更好理解可能有助于识别临床生物标志物,并指导抗血管生成药物在个体患者治疗中的最佳使用。