Cernanova Krohova J, Czippelova B, Turianikova Z, Pernice R, Busacca A, Faes L, Javorka M
Department of Physiology and Biomedical Centre Martin (BioMed Martin), Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia.
Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
J Physiol Pharmacol. 2022 Oct;73(5). doi: 10.26402/jpp.2022.5.02. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
The baroreflex (BR) is an important physiological regulatory mechanism which reacts to blood pressure perturbations with reflex changes of target variables such as the heart period (electrocardiogram derived RR interval) or the peripheral vascular resistance (PVR). Evaluation of cardiac chronotropic (RR as a target variable) and vascular resistance (target PVR) BR arms was in previous studies mainly based on the use of the spontaneous variability of the systolic or diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), respectively, as the input signals. The use of other blood pressure measures such as the mean blood pressure (MBP) as an input signal for BR analysis is still under investigation. Making the assumption that the strength of coupling along the BR indicates the more appropriate input signal for baroreflex analysis, we employ partial spectral decomposition to assess in the frequency domain the causal coupling from SBP, MBP or DBP to RR or PVR. Noninvasive beat-to-beat recording of RR, SBP, MBP and DBP and PVR was performed in 39 and 36 volunteers in whom orthostatic and cognitive loads were evoked respectively through head-up tilt and mental arithmetic task. At rest, the MBP was most tightly coupled with RR, in contrast to the analysis of the vascular resistance BR arm where the results showed similar importance of all blood pressure input signals. During orthostasis, the increased importance of SBP as the input signal for BR analysis along the cardiac chronotropic arm was demonstrated. In addition, the gain from MBP to RR was more sensitive to physiological state changes compared to gains with SBP or DBP signal as inputs. We conclude that the coupling strength depends not only on the analysed baroreflex arm but also on the selection of the input blood pressure signal and the physiological state. The MBP signal should be more frequently used for the cardiac baroreflex analysis.
压力反射(BR)是一种重要的生理调节机制,它通过诸如心动周期(心电图衍生的RR间期)或外周血管阻力(PVR)等目标变量的反射性变化来应对血压波动。在以往的研究中,对心脏变时性(以RR作为目标变量)和血管阻力(目标PVR)压力反射臂的评估主要分别基于使用收缩压或舒张压(SBP、DBP)的自发变异性作为输入信号。将平均血压(MBP)等其他血压测量值用作压力反射分析的输入信号仍在研究中。假设沿压力反射的耦合强度表明了用于压力反射分析的更合适输入信号,我们采用部分频谱分解在频域中评估从SBP、MBP或DBP到RR或PVR的因果耦合。对39名和36名志愿者进行了RR、SBP、MBP、DBP和PVR的无创逐搏记录,其中分别通过头高位倾斜和心算任务诱发体位性和认知负荷。在静息状态下,MBP与RR的耦合最为紧密,这与血管阻力压力反射臂的分析结果不同,后者显示所有血压输入信号的重要性相似。在体位性应激期间,显示出SBP作为沿心脏变时性臂的压力反射分析输入信号的重要性增加。此外,与以SBP或DBP信号作为输入的增益相比,从MBP到RR的增益对生理状态变化更敏感。我们得出结论,耦合强度不仅取决于所分析的压力反射臂,还取决于输入血压信号的选择和生理状态。MBP信号应更频繁地用于心脏压力反射分析。