Suppr超能文献

助听器惠益与满意度消费者调查。

Consumer Survey on Hearing Aid Benefit and Satisfaction.

机构信息

Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Apr 12;66(4):1410-1427. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00066. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

There is unexplained variability in self-reported hearing aid outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate determinants of hearing aid benefit and satisfaction ratings using a large-scale customer survey and to analyze the relation between demographic variables, hearing aid attributes, benefit, and satisfaction.

METHOD

The study used a retrospective design wherein 2,109 hearing aid users, recruited by Hearing Tracker and Hearing Loss Association of America, completed an online survey. The survey included questions about demographics, perceived hearing loss, devices, service delivery, cost, benefit, and satisfaction. The analytic approach included descriptive summaries and regression models to evaluate potential determinants of hearing aid benefit and satisfaction ratings.

RESULTS

Hearing aid sound quality, fit and comfort, and battery life were related to both benefit and satisfaction. Respondents who rated these outcomes favorably were also likely to benefit from, and be satisfied with, their hearing aids. Benefit was also related to degree of hearing loss, hearing aid experience, and cost. Hearing aid users with greater self-perceived hearing loss, more hearing aid experience, and more expensive hearing aids reported more benefit. Satisfaction was also related to age, employment status, and brand. Younger respondents, those who were students, and those using certain brands reported more satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

The results highlight importance of good hearing aid outcomes (quality, fit/comfort, and battery life) for benefit and satisfaction ratings. Professionals who fit hearing aids should strive to focus on achieving these outcomes and researchers should strive to explain the remaining variability in ratings of benefit and satisfaction.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.22280854.

摘要

目的

自我报告的助听器效果存在无法解释的变异性。本研究旨在使用大规模客户调查评估助听器效果和满意度评分的决定因素,并分析人口统计学变量、助听器属性、效果和满意度之间的关系。

方法

该研究采用回顾性设计,由 Hearing Tracker 和 Hearing Loss Association of America 招募的 2109 名助听器用户完成了在线调查。该调查包括关于人口统计学、感知听力损失、设备、服务提供、成本、效果和满意度的问题。分析方法包括描述性总结和回归模型,以评估助听器效果和满意度评分的潜在决定因素。

结果

助听器的音质、适配舒适度和电池寿命与效果和满意度均相关。对这些结果评价良好的受访者也可能从助听器中受益并对其感到满意。效果还与听力损失程度、助听器使用经验和成本有关。自我感知听力损失更大、助听器使用经验更丰富、助听器更昂贵的用户报告效果更好。满意度还与年龄、就业状况和品牌有关。年龄较小的受访者、学生和使用某些品牌的受访者报告的满意度更高。

结论

结果强调了助听器效果(音质、适配舒适度和电池寿命)对效果和满意度评分的重要性。验配助听器的专业人员应努力专注于实现这些结果,研究人员应努力解释效果和满意度评分的剩余变异性。

补充材料

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.22280854.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验