Suppr超能文献

结肠镜检查中肠道准备方案的评估,包括一种新型低容量方案(普芦卡必利/聚乙二醇电解质散):CLEANSE 研究。

Evaluation of bowel preparation regimens for colonoscopy including a novel low volume regimen (Plenvu): CLEANSE study.

机构信息

Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK

Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2022-001070.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Poor bowel preparation is the leading cause of failed colonoscopies and increases costs significantly. Several, split preparation, 2 day regimens are available and recently, Plenvu, a low-volume preparation which can be given on 1 day has been introduced.

AIMS

Assess efficacy and tolerability of commonly used purgative regimens including Plenvu.

METHOD

In this service evaluation, patients undergoing screening colonoscopy at St Mark's Hospital, London (February 2020-December 2021) were provided Plenvu (1 or 2 days), Moviprep (2 days) or Senna & Citramag (2 days).Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score, fluid volumes and procedure times were recorded. A patient experience questionnaire evaluated taste, volume acceptability, completion and side effects.

RESULTS

563 patients were invited to participate and 553 included: 218 Moviprep 2 days, 108 Senna & Citramag 2 days, 152 Plenvu 2 days and 75 Plenvu 1 day.BBPS scores were higher with Plenvu 1 and 2 days vs Senna & Citramag (p=0.003 and 0.002, respectively) and vs Moviprep (p=0.003 and 0.001, respectively). No other significant pairwise BBPS differences and no difference in preparation adequacy was seen between the groups.Patients rated taste as most pleasant with Senna & Citramag and this achieved significance versus Plenvu 1 day and 2 days (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively) and versus Moviprep (p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

BBPS score was higher for 1 day and 2 days Plenvu versus both Senna & Citramag and Moviprep. Taste was not highly rated for Plenvu but it appears to offer effective cleansing even when given as a same day preparation.

摘要

背景

肠道准备不佳是结肠镜检查失败的主要原因,并且显著增加了成本。目前有几种分剂量的、两天的方案,最近还推出了一种低容量的准备方案 Plenvu,可以在一天内使用。

目的

评估包括 Plenvu 在内的常用泻药方案的疗效和耐受性。

方法

在这项服务评估中,伦敦圣马克医院(2020 年 2 月至 2021 年 12 月)接受筛查性结肠镜检查的患者被给予 Plenvu(1 天或 2 天)、Moviprep(2 天)或 Senna & Citramag(2 天)。记录波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)评分、液体量和手术时间。患者体验问卷评估了味道、容量接受度、完成情况和副作用。

结果

共邀请了 563 名患者参与,其中 553 名患者纳入研究:218 名 Moviprep 2 天组、108 名 Senna & Citramag 2 天组、152 名 Plenvu 2 天组和 75 名 Plenvu 1 天组。Plenvu 1 天和 2 天组的 BBPS 评分高于 Senna & Citramag 组(p=0.003 和 0.002,分别)和 Moviprep 组(p=0.003 和 0.001,分别)。各组之间的 BBPS 评分无显著差异,准备充分性也无差异。患者认为 Senna & Citramag 的味道最宜人,与 Plenvu 1 天和 2 天组(p=0.002 和 p<0.001,分别)和 Moviprep 组(p=0.04)相比,差异具有统计学意义。

结论

Plenvu 1 天和 2 天组的 BBPS 评分高于 Senna & Citramag 组和 Moviprep 组。Plenvu 的味道评价不高,但即使作为当天的准备方案,它似乎也能提供有效的清洁效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2e/10032399/73be50dadcd8/bmjgast-2022-001070f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验