Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK.
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2022-001070.
Poor bowel preparation is the leading cause of failed colonoscopies and increases costs significantly. Several, split preparation, 2 day regimens are available and recently, Plenvu, a low-volume preparation which can be given on 1 day has been introduced.
Assess efficacy and tolerability of commonly used purgative regimens including Plenvu.
In this service evaluation, patients undergoing screening colonoscopy at St Mark's Hospital, London (February 2020-December 2021) were provided Plenvu (1 or 2 days), Moviprep (2 days) or Senna & Citramag (2 days).Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score, fluid volumes and procedure times were recorded. A patient experience questionnaire evaluated taste, volume acceptability, completion and side effects.
563 patients were invited to participate and 553 included: 218 Moviprep 2 days, 108 Senna & Citramag 2 days, 152 Plenvu 2 days and 75 Plenvu 1 day.BBPS scores were higher with Plenvu 1 and 2 days vs Senna & Citramag (p=0.003 and 0.002, respectively) and vs Moviprep (p=0.003 and 0.001, respectively). No other significant pairwise BBPS differences and no difference in preparation adequacy was seen between the groups.Patients rated taste as most pleasant with Senna & Citramag and this achieved significance versus Plenvu 1 day and 2 days (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively) and versus Moviprep (p=0.04).
BBPS score was higher for 1 day and 2 days Plenvu versus both Senna & Citramag and Moviprep. Taste was not highly rated for Plenvu but it appears to offer effective cleansing even when given as a same day preparation.
肠道准备不佳是结肠镜检查失败的主要原因,并且显著增加了成本。目前有几种分剂量的、两天的方案,最近还推出了一种低容量的准备方案 Plenvu,可以在一天内使用。
评估包括 Plenvu 在内的常用泻药方案的疗效和耐受性。
在这项服务评估中,伦敦圣马克医院(2020 年 2 月至 2021 年 12 月)接受筛查性结肠镜检查的患者被给予 Plenvu(1 天或 2 天)、Moviprep(2 天)或 Senna & Citramag(2 天)。记录波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)评分、液体量和手术时间。患者体验问卷评估了味道、容量接受度、完成情况和副作用。
共邀请了 563 名患者参与,其中 553 名患者纳入研究:218 名 Moviprep 2 天组、108 名 Senna & Citramag 2 天组、152 名 Plenvu 2 天组和 75 名 Plenvu 1 天组。Plenvu 1 天和 2 天组的 BBPS 评分高于 Senna & Citramag 组(p=0.003 和 0.002,分别)和 Moviprep 组(p=0.003 和 0.001,分别)。各组之间的 BBPS 评分无显著差异,准备充分性也无差异。患者认为 Senna & Citramag 的味道最宜人,与 Plenvu 1 天和 2 天组(p=0.002 和 p<0.001,分别)和 Moviprep 组(p=0.04)相比,差异具有统计学意义。
Plenvu 1 天和 2 天组的 BBPS 评分高于 Senna & Citramag 组和 Moviprep 组。Plenvu 的味道评价不高,但即使作为当天的准备方案,它似乎也能提供有效的清洁效果。