• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统经皮肾镜取石术与电子可控穿刺双通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗完全性鹿角形肾结石的比较。

Comparison of the Conventional PNL with Ecirs in the Treatment of Complete Staghorn Kidney Stones.

作者信息

Goktug Hasan Nedim Goksel, Ozturk Ufuk, Cimen Sertac, Kaymak Serafettin, Dogan Ahmet Emin, Imamoglu Muhammet Abdurrahim

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2023 Mar;33(3):346-351. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2023.03.346.

DOI:10.29271/jcpsp.2023.03.346
PMID:36945168
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the results of conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) in treating complete staghorn kidney calculi.

STUDY DESIGN

A comparative study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, between January 2007 and January 2022.

METHODOLOGY

Clinical data and surgical outcomes of the adult patients who underwent conventional PNL or ECIRS were retrospectively reviewed. Two patient groups were compared regarding the fluoroscopy time, the number of access, surgical time, duration of hospitalisation, haemoglobin (Hb) reduction, complication, and stone-free rates.  Results: There were 132 renal units in the conventional PNL (Group 1) and 45 renal units in the ECIRS group (Group 2). The comparative analysis revealed that fluoroscopy time, surgical time, duration of hospital stay, number of access, and the Hb drop were significantly lower in the ECIRS group compared to the conventional PNL group. Although stone-free rates were 48.5% in Group 1 and 64.4% in Group 2, p=0.064 and p>0.05 respectively). The median value of the complication grade was 1 (1-7) in Group 1 and 1 (1-5) in Group 2, (U=2446.5, p=0.026).  Conclusion: The ECIRS is a successful and more secure surgical method for treating complete staghorn stones than PNL.

KEY WORDS

PNL, ECIRS, Staghorn, Kidney, Stone.

摘要

目的

分析传统经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)和内镜联合肾内手术(ECIRS)治疗完全鹿角形肾结石的效果。

研究设计

一项对比研究。研究地点和时间:2007年1月至2022年1月期间,土耳其安卡拉健康科学大学迪斯卡皮·耶尔德勒姆·贝亚齐特培训与研究医院泌尿外科。

方法

回顾性分析接受传统PNL或ECIRS的成年患者的临床资料和手术结果。比较两组患者的透视时间、穿刺通道数量、手术时间、住院时间、血红蛋白(Hb)降低情况、并发症及结石清除率。结果:传统PNL组(第1组)有132个肾单位,ECIRS组(第2组)有45个肾单位。对比分析显示,与传统PNL组相比,ECIRS组的透视时间、手术时间、住院时间、穿刺通道数量和Hb下降幅度显著更低。虽然第1组结石清除率为48.5%,第2组为64.4%,但p值分别为0.064和p>0.05)。第1组并发症分级的中位数为1(1 - 7),第2组为1(1 - 5),(U = 2446.5,p = 0.026)。结论:与PNL相比,ECIRS是治疗完全鹿角形结石的一种成功且更安全的手术方法。

关键词

PNL;ECIRS;鹿角形;肾脏;结石

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Conventional PNL with Ecirs in the Treatment of Complete Staghorn Kidney Stones.传统经皮肾镜取石术与电子可控穿刺双通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗完全性鹿角形肾结石的比较。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2023 Mar;33(3):346-351. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2023.03.346.
2
Comparison of mini endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery and multitract minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy specifically for kidney staghorn stones: a single-centre experience.微通道经皮肾镜碎石术与多通道微创经皮肾镜碎石术治疗鹿角形肾结石的比较:单中心经验。
BMC Urol. 2022 Jun 30;22(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01030-7.
3
Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery versus percutaneuos nephrolithotomy for complex pediatric stone disease: A comparative analysis of efficacy and safety.内镜下联合肾内手术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗复杂小儿肾结石病:疗效和安全性的对比分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Aug;20(4):606.e1-606.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.05.025. Epub 2024 May 31.
4
Efficacy of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in the prone split-leg position for staghorn calculi.俯卧分腿位内镜联合肾内手术治疗鹿角形结石的疗效
J Endourol. 2015 Jan;29(1):19-24. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0372.
5
Does Access Location Influence Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Staghorn Stones?穿刺部位会影响鹿角形结石经皮肾镜取石术的结果吗?
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021 Sep;31(9):1075-1080. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2021.09.1075.
6
A comparative study of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) in the galdakao-modified supine valdivia (GMSV) position and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex nephrolithiasis: a retrospective single-center study.经皮肾镜取石术与改良斜仰卧位下经皮肾镜碎石术治疗复杂性肾结石的对比研究:一项回顾性单中心研究
Urolithiasis. 2021 Apr;49(2):161-166. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01207-5. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
7
Comparison of supine and prone positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment of staghorn stones.仰卧位与俯卧位经皮肾镜取石术治疗鹿角形结石的比较。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Dec;45(6):603-608. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0977-y. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
8
[Comparison of multi-tract PCNL and single-tract ECIRS in semisupine-lithotomy position for staghorn renal calculi].半仰卧截石位下多通道经皮肾镜取石术与单通道逆行体内冲击波碎石术治疗鹿角形肾结石的比较
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Oct 19;101(38):3121-3126. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210223-00473.
9
Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery with flexible ureteroscope for partial staghorn calculi: A randomised controlled trial.微创经皮肾镜取石术与软性输尿管镜下内镜联合肾内手术治疗部分鹿角形结石的随机对照试验
Int J Surg. 2016 Apr;28:22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.02.056. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
10
Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for high burden renal stones.内镜联合肾内手术治疗高负荷肾结石。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2010 Mar;82(1):41-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Current role of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in the management of renal stones: A scoping review.内镜联合肾内手术在肾结石治疗中的当前作用:一项范围综述。
Indian J Urol. 2023 Oct-Dec;39(4):274-284. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_249_23. Epub 2023 Sep 29.