Suppr超能文献

对于接受经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗的患者,我们仍需要评估术后桡动脉压迫时间和桡动脉闭塞情况吗?

Do We Still Need to Assess Post-procedural Radial Artery Compression Time and Radial Artery Occlusion in Patients Who Undergo Transradial Coronary Intervention?

作者信息

Bardooli Fawaz, Kumar Dileep

机构信息

Interventional Cardiology, Mohammed Bin Khalifa Bin Sulman Al Khalifa Specialist Cardiac Centre, Awali, BHR.

Cardiology, Mohammed Bin Khalifa Bin Sulman Al Khalifa Specialist Cardiac Centre, Awali, BHR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Feb 17;15(2):e35129. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35129. eCollection 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Background and objective Transradial access (TRA) for interventional coronary procedures has now been widely accepted as the preferred vascular site approach. The duration of post-procedure compression has been shown to be a crucial factor and different hemostatic devices used in this regard have been compared. In this study, we aimed to compare the post-procedure compression time, radial artery occlusion (RAO), hematoma, and bleeding between the transradial (TR) band and AIR band for radial artery patency among patients presenting at a tertiary care hospital. Methodology This observational study was conducted at the Department of Cardiology of Mohammed Bin Khalifa Bin Sulman Al Khalifa Specialist Cardiac Centre, Awali, Bahrain from 06/03/2022 to 05/06/2022. The research involved patients of either gender who had a positive Barbeau test (type A to C) and were receiving percutaneous coronary intervention via a transradial route. Patients who underwent transradial coronary intervention were classified into two separate groups, depending on whether an AIR band (group A) or a TR band (group B) compression was used. Following coronary catheterization, radial hemostatic compression devices were used. The results were documented both during and after the hemostatic compression. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results Of the total 100 patients included in the study, the majority were males (86%) and aged more than 50 years (83%). AIR band was successfully removed in 32 patients (64%) in less than four hours, compared to the TR band, which was removed in less than four hours in two patients (4%) only (p=0.001). The incidences of bleeding (p=0.790) and RAO (p=0.495) were similar between the AIR band group and the TR band group. Hematoma was not seen in any of the patients in either group. Conclusion AIR band was observed to be more efficacious in decreasing the radial artery compression time. However, the difference in RAO was insignificant in the short term, and follow-up studies are required to see if the AIR band is associated with any long-term benefits.

摘要

背景与目的 经桡动脉途径(TRA)用于介入性冠状动脉手术现已被广泛接受为首选的血管入路方法。术后压迫时间已被证明是一个关键因素,并且已对这方面使用的不同止血装置进行了比较。在本研究中,我们旨在比较三级护理医院中接受经桡动脉(TR)带和AIR带治疗的患者之间的术后压迫时间、桡动脉闭塞(RAO)、血肿和出血情况,以评估桡动脉通畅情况。

方法 本观察性研究于2022年3月6日至2022年6月5日在巴林阿瓦利的穆罕默德·本·哈利法·本·苏尔曼·阿勒哈利法专科心脏中心心脏病科进行。该研究纳入了Barbeau试验阳性(A至C型)且正在接受经桡动脉途径经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的男女患者。接受经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗的患者根据是否使用AIR带(A组)或TR带(B组)压迫分为两个独立的组。冠状动脉导管插入术后,使用桡动脉止血压迫装置。在止血压迫期间和之后记录结果。使用IBM SPSS Statistics 23版(IBM公司,纽约州阿蒙克)对数据进行分析。

结果 在纳入研究的100名患者中,大多数为男性(86%)且年龄超过50岁(83%)。32名患者(64%)在不到4小时内成功移除了AIR带,相比之下,TR带组只有2名患者(4%)在不到4小时内移除了TR带(p=0.001)。AIR带组和TR带组之间的出血发生率(p=0.790)和RAO发生率(p=0.495)相似。两组患者均未出现血肿。

结论 观察到AIR带在减少桡动脉压迫时间方面更有效。然而,短期内RAO的差异不显著,需要进行后续研究以观察AIR带是否具有任何长期益处。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Study on the Safety of the New Radial Artery Hemostasis Device.新型桡动脉止血装置安全性研究。
J Interv Cardiol. 2022 Apr 5;2022:2345584. doi: 10.1155/2022/2345584. eCollection 2022.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验