• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

残胃癌患者根治性全胃切除术中脾切除术的预后意义:倾向评分匹配分析

Prognostic significance of splenectomy during completion total gastrectomy in patients with remnant gastric cancer: propensity score matching analysis.

作者信息

Back Seung Hyun, Oh Sung Eun, An Ji Yeong, Choi Min-Gew, Sohn Tae Sung, Bae Jae Moon, Lee Jun Ho

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec;17(2):96-103. doi: 10.14216/kjco.21015. Epub 2021 Dec 31.

DOI:10.14216/kjco.21015
PMID:36945668
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9942751/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Splenectomy for patients with remnant gastric cancer has been controversial. The purpose of this study is to identify the impact of splenectomy in the treatment of remnant gastric cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 285 patients with remnant gastric cancer who underwent completion total gastrectomy with or without splenectomy in Samsung Medical Center, between September 1996 and December 2017. We used a 1:1 propensity score matching method for the analysis. The matching factors were age, sex, and pathologic stage. After the matching process, we compared the 5-year overall survival (OS) and the disease-free survival (DFS) between patients with and without splenectomy during completion total gastrectomy.

RESULTS

The median duration of follow-up was 58.0 months (range, 0-132 months). After propensity score matching, there were no statistically significant differences between the splenectomy group (n=77) and no splenectomy group (n=77) in terms of clinicopathological features. The 5-year OS rate between the no splenectomy and splenectomy group were not significantly different. There was no significant difference between 5-year DFS of the matched groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that splenectomy is not a significant prognostic factor in terms of 5-year OS (no splenectomy vs. splenectomy; 61.5% vs. 60.2%, P=0.884) or DFS (74.9% vs. 69.8%, P=0.880).

CONCLUSION

Splenectomy has no impact on the OS and DFS in patients with remnant gastric cancer. Splenectomy during completion total gastrectomy may not be necessary.

摘要

目的

对于残胃癌患者行脾切除术一直存在争议。本研究的目的是确定脾切除术在残胃癌治疗中的影响。

方法

我们回顾性分析了1996年9月至2017年12月期间在三星医疗中心接受根治性全胃切除术(伴或不伴脾切除术)的285例残胃癌患者。我们采用1:1倾向评分匹配法进行分析。匹配因素为年龄、性别和病理分期。匹配过程完成后,我们比较了根治性全胃切除术中行脾切除术和未行脾切除术患者的5年总生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS)。

结果

中位随访时间为58.0个月(范围0 - 132个月)。倾向评分匹配后,脾切除组(n = 77)和未脾切除组(n = 77)在临床病理特征方面无统计学显著差异。未脾切除组和脾切除组的5年OS率无显著差异。匹配组的5年DFS也无显著差异。多因素分析显示,就5年OS(未脾切除组 vs. 脾切除组;61.5% vs. 60.2%,P = 0.884)或DFS(74.9% vs. 69.8%,P = 0.880)而言,脾切除术不是一个显著的预后因素。

结论

脾切除术对残胃癌患者的OS和DFS没有影响。根治性全胃切除术中可能无需行脾切除术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ca2/9942751/7a8fb6fdfbbd/kjco-17-2-96f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ca2/9942751/7a8fb6fdfbbd/kjco-17-2-96f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ca2/9942751/7a8fb6fdfbbd/kjco-17-2-96f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognostic significance of splenectomy during completion total gastrectomy in patients with remnant gastric cancer: propensity score matching analysis.残胃癌患者根治性全胃切除术中脾切除术的预后意义:倾向评分匹配分析
Korean J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec;17(2):96-103. doi: 10.14216/kjco.21015. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
2
The outcome of young vs. old gastric cancer patients following gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.老年与年轻胃癌患者胃切除术后结局的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Surg. 2021 Nov 19;21(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01401-1.
3
Adverse prognostic impact of splenectomy on survival in gastric carcinoma patients: Regression and propensity score matching analysis of 1074 patients.脾切除术对胃癌患者生存的不良预后影响:对 1074 例患者的回归和倾向评分匹配分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 11;13(9):e0203820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203820. eCollection 2018.
4
The effects of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy on the surgical outcome of proximal gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched, case-control study.腹腔镜保留脾脏的脾门淋巴结清扫术对近端胃癌手术结局的影响:一项倾向评分匹配的病例对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1383-1392. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5126-0. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
5
Significance of lymphadenectomy with splenectomy in radical surgery for advanced (pT3/pT4) remnant gastric cancer.淋巴结清扫联合脾切除在进展期(pT3/pT4)残胃癌根治性手术中的意义
Surgery. 2016 Apr;159(4):1082-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
6
Clinicopathological features and impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on the long-term survival of patients with multiple gastric cancers: a propensity score matching analysis.多原发胃癌的临床病理特征及辅助化疗对长期生存的影响:倾向评分匹配分析。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2019 Feb 11;39(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40880-019-0350-3.
7
Is Splenic Hilar Lymph Node Dissection Without Splenectomy Essential for Proximal Advanced Gastric Cancer?脾门淋巴结清扫术在近端进展期胃癌中是否必要?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):8952-8961. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10354-x. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
8
Efficacy of Splenectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer with Greater Curvature Invasion or Type 4 Tumor: a Propensity Score Analysis of a Multi-Institutional Dataset.胃大弯侵犯或 4 型胃癌行脾切除术的疗效:多中心数据集的倾向评分分析。
World J Surg. 2021 Sep;45(9):2840-2848. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06173-6. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
9
[Clinicopathological features and survival analysis of gastric cancer patients with neuroendocrine differentiation after radical resection].[胃癌根治术后神经内分泌分化患者的临床病理特征及生存分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 May 25;24(5):426-432. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20201126-00627.
10
A propensity score-matched comparison of laparoscopic distal versus total gastrectomy for middle-third advanced gastric cancer.腹腔镜下远端胃切除术与全胃切除术治疗胃中三分之一进展期胃癌的倾向评分匹配比较。
Int J Surg. 2018 Dec;60:194-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.11.015. Epub 2018 Nov 20.

本文引用的文献

1
The value of N staging with the positive lymph node ratio, and splenectomy, for remnant gastric cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.阳性淋巴结比率的N分期及脾切除术对残胃癌的价值:一项多中心回顾性研究。
J Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec;116(7):884-893. doi: 10.1002/jso.24737. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
2
Current status in remnant gastric cancer after distal gastrectomy.远端胃切除术后残胃癌的现状
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb 28;22(8):2424-33. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i8.2424.
3
Significance of lymphadenectomy with splenectomy in radical surgery for advanced (pT3/pT4) remnant gastric cancer.
淋巴结清扫联合脾切除在进展期(pT3/pT4)残胃癌根治性手术中的意义
Surgery. 2016 Apr;159(4):1082-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
4
Risk factors for complications during surgical treatment of remnant gastric cancer.残胃癌手术治疗并发症的危险因素。
Gastric Cancer. 2015 Apr;18(2):390-6. doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0369-8. Epub 2014 Apr 5.
5
Differences of the lymphatic distribution and surgical outcomes between remnant gastric cancers and primary proximal gastric cancers.残胃癌与原发性近端胃癌的淋巴分布差异及手术结局。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Mar;16(3):503-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1804-3. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
6
Radical gastrectomy with combined splenectomy: unnecessary.根治性胃切除术联合脾切除术:不必要。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2011 May-Jun;58(107-108):1067-70.
7
Survival benefits from splenic hilar lymph node dissection by splenectomy in gastric cancer patients: relative comparison of the benefits in subgroups of patients.脾门淋巴结清扫术联合脾切除术对胃癌患者生存获益的影响:亚组患者获益的相对比较。
Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;14(2):172-7. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0028-2. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
8
Prognosis of metastatic splenic hilum lymph node in patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy and splenectomy.全胃切除及脾切除术后胃癌患者脾门淋巴结转移的预后
World J Hepatol. 2010 Feb 27;2(2):81-6. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v2.i2.81.
9
Treatment and outcome of patients with gastric remnant cancer after resection for peptic ulcer disease.胃大部切除术后治疗消化性溃疡胃残胃癌患者的疗效及预后
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Mar;18(3):670-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1425-1. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
10
Effectiveness and safety of splenectomy for gastric carcinoma: a meta-analysis.脾切除术治疗胃癌的有效性和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Nov 14;15(42):5352-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5352.