Suppr超能文献

[同侧股骨颈和股骨干骨折的手术治疗]

[Surgical treatment for ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fracture].

作者信息

Dou Bang, Ma Wen-Qian, Qin Tao, Zhu Wei, Dai Ya-Hui, Xu Xiao-Bin

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Songjiang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine<Preparatory Stage>, Shanghai 201600, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2023 Mar 25;36(3):203-8. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.03.002.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively analyze efficacy of single structure internal fixation and double structure internal fixation in the treatment of ipsilateral femoral shaft and neck fracture, and analyze their indications.

METHODS

From June 2015 to December 2020, 21 patients with ipsilateral femoral shaft and femoral neck fracture were treated, including 14 males and 7 females, aged 23 to 69 years old with an average of(38.1±12.9) years old. According to different femoral shaft fracture sites, some patients were fixed with cephalomedullary implant for both femoral neck and the femoral shaft(single structure, InterTan or PFNA Ⅱ), some patients were fixed with cannulated screws for the femoral neck and a retrograde locking nail for the femoral shaft (dual structure), and postoperative function and complications were recorded during follow-up. In 10 cases of single-structure fixation, the femoral necks were all basicervical fractures, and the femoral shaft fractures were located in the proximal isthmus;11 cases were double-structure fixation, 9 cases in 11 were basal type of femoral neck, 2 cases in 11 were neck type, and the femoral shaft fractures were located in the isthmus and the distal isthmus.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up for 12 to 27 months. No femoral head necrosis, deformity, delay or nonunion occurred in the patients with single-structure fixation, and no delayed union or nonunion occurred in femoral shaft fractures;At the final follow-up, Harris score of patients with single-structure fixation was 91.8±4.1, with 8 cases were excellent and 2 cases were good. The fractures of patients with dual-structure fixation achieved good union without femoral head necrosis, except 1 case of femoral shaft fracture had delayed union;At the final follow-up, Harris score of patients with dual-structure fixation was 92.4±5.9, 7 cases were excellent, 3 cases were good, and 1 case was fair.

CONCLUSION

Good reduction and fixation is the key to the treatment of such fractures. Both the single-structure fixation and the dual-structure fixation are good methods, and it should be selected according to the locations of femoral shaft and femoral neck fractures. Single-structure fixation is a good choice for femoral shaft fractures located at the proximal isthmus and basal femoral neck fractures. For isthmus and distal femoral shaft fractures combined with ipsilateral femoral neck fractures, dual-structure fixation is recommended.

摘要

目的

回顾性分析单结构内固定与双结构内固定治疗同侧股骨干与股骨颈骨折的疗效,并分析其适应证。

方法

选取2015年6月至2020年12月收治的21例同侧股骨干与股骨颈骨折患者,其中男14例,女7例,年龄23~69岁,平均(38.1±12.9)岁。根据股骨干骨折部位不同,部分患者采用股骨颈与股骨干均用髓内植入物固定(单结构,InterTan或PFNAⅡ),部分患者采用股骨颈空心钉与股骨干逆行锁定髓内钉固定(双结构),随访记录术后功能及并发症情况。单结构固定10例,股骨颈均为基底型骨折,股骨干骨折位于近端峡部;双结构固定11例,11例中9例股骨颈为基底型,2例为头颈型,股骨干骨折位于峡部及远端峡部。

结果

所有患者均随访12~27个月。单结构固定患者未发生股骨头坏死、畸形、延迟愈合或不愈合,股骨干骨折未发生延迟愈合或不愈合;末次随访时,单结构固定患者Harris评分为91.8±4.1,优8例,良2例。双结构固定患者骨折均愈合良好,无股骨头坏死,仅1例股骨干骨折发生延迟愈合;末次随访时,双结构固定患者Harris评分为92.4±5.9,优7例,良3例,可1例。

结论

良好的复位与固定是此类骨折治疗的关键。单结构固定与双结构固定均是较好的方法,应根据股骨干与股骨颈骨折的部位选择。对于位于近端峡部的股骨干骨折及基底型股骨颈骨折,单结构固定是较好的选择。对于峡部及远端股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨颈骨折,推荐双结构固定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验