From the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH and.
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Loma Linda Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, CA.
ASAIO J. 2023 Jul 1;69(7):687-694. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001920. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
This study evaluated practices for image guidance during placement of bicaval dual-lumen (BCDL) venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) cannulas in pediatric and adolescent patients and elucidates reasoning behind surgeon practices. A survey covering VV-ECMO practice and opinions was distributed by the American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) to all attending members. A total of 110 pediatric surgeons responded (11.3%). During initial BCDL cannula placement, 67.7% of surgeons reported using bimodal imaging with either fluoroscopy (38.4%) or x-ray (29.3%) plus echocardiography. Although 37.4% of surgeons used serial x-rays during cannula placement, only 5.9% believed it was best practice to do so ( P < 0.0001). Rather, 60.4% believed that fluoroscopy was the standard. Among surgeons not using fluoroscopy, 27.6% (13.3% of respondents) reported fluoroscopy added unnecessary complexity or that they preferred another modality. More frequently, reasons for not using fluoroscopy are related to resource limitations. Echocardiography use to confirm cannula position was considered best practice by 92.1% of surgeons, with 86.9% utilization. Therefore, most pediatric surgeons use multimodal imaging during cannulation and consider it best practice. Fluoroscopy is preferred, but its use is frequently limited by hospital resources. Echocardiography is widely available and used. These data represent increased consensus among surgeons and present opportunities for modernization of hospital resources and standards.
这项研究评估了在小儿和青少年患者中放置双腔下腔静脉(BCDL)双腔静脉体外膜肺氧合(VV-ECMO)导管时进行图像引导的实践,并阐明了外科医生实践背后的原因。美国小儿外科学会(APSA)向所有主治医生分发了一份涵盖 VV-ECMO 实践和意见的调查。共有 110 名小儿外科医生做出了回应(11.3%)。在最初的 BCDL 导管放置过程中,67.7%的外科医生报告说使用双模式成像,包括透视(38.4%)或 X 射线(29.3%)加超声心动图。尽管 37.4%的外科医生在导管放置过程中使用连续 X 射线,但只有 5.9%的人认为这是最佳做法(P < 0.0001)。相反,60.4%的人认为透视是标准。在不使用透视的外科医生中,27.6%(13.3%的受访者)报告说透视增加了不必要的复杂性,或者他们更喜欢另一种模式。更多情况下,不使用透视的原因与资源限制有关。92.1%的外科医生认为使用超声心动图来确认导管位置是最佳做法,其中 86.9%的人在使用。因此,大多数小儿外科医生在导管插入过程中使用多模式成像,并认为这是最佳做法。透视是首选,但由于医院资源的限制,其使用频率受到限制。超声心动图广泛可用并得到广泛应用。这些数据代表了外科医生之间的共识增加,并为医院资源和标准的现代化提供了机会。