• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国主动脉研究联合会研究分支型腔内主动脉修复术中分支定向支架选择对靶动脉结局的影响。

Effect of bridging stent graft selection for directional branches on target artery outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair in the United States Aortic Research Consortium.

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX.

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jul;78(1):10-28.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.03.025. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2023.03.025
PMID:36948277
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of directional branches (DBs) bridging stent choice on target artery (TA) outcomes during fenestrated-branched endovascular repair of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in nine prospective physician-sponsored investigational device exemption studies in the United States between 2005 and 2020 were analyzed. All patients who had at least one TA incorporated by DB using either self-expandable (SESGs), balloon-expandable (BESGs), or hybrid stent graft combinations (HSGs). Endpoints were TA patency and freedom from TA endoleak, instability, and reintervention.

RESULTS

There were 800 patients with 2426 renal-mesenteric arteries incorporated by DBs. DB stent selection was SESGs in 1205 TAs (50%), BESGs in 1095 TAs (45%), and HSGs in 126 TAs (5%). SESGs were predominantly used in the first three quartiles of the study period, whereas BESGs comprised 75% of all stents between 2017 and 2020. The median follow-up was 15 months (interquartile range, 6-35 months). At 5 years, BESGs had significantly lower freedom from TA instability (78% ± 4% vs 88% ± 1% vs 96% ± 2%; log-rank P =.010), freedom from TA endoleaks (87% ± 3% vs 97% ± 1% vs 99% ± 1%; log-rank P < .001), and freedom from TA reintervention (83% ± 4% vs 95% ± 1% vs 99% ± 2%; log-rank P <.001) compared with SESGs or HSGs, respectively. For renal arteries, there was no difference in freedom from TA instability for BESGs, SESGs, or HSGs. However, freedom from TA endoleaks and reintervention were lower for renal arteries targeted by BESGs compared with DBs targeted by SESGs and HSGs (83% ± 6% vs 98% ± 1% vs 100%; log-rank P < .001; and 70% ± 10% vs 92% ± 1% vs 96% ± 4%; log-rank P = .022). For mesenteric arteries, DBs targeted by BESGs had lower freedom from TA instability, endoleak, and reintervention than SESGs or HSGs. In stent-specific analysis, iCAST BESGs had the lowest freedom from TA instability either for renal or mesenteric arteries, primarily due to higher rates of TA endoleaks. There was no difference in patency in any scenario. Independent predictors of TA instability were age (+1-year: hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-0.99), stent diameter (+1 mm: HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.57-0.80), and BESG (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-2.9).

CONCLUSIONS

DBs incorporated using BESGs had lower freedom from TA instability, TA endoleak, and TA reintervention compared with SESGs and HSGs. The patency of DBs was not affected by the type of stent construction. The observed performance disadvantage associated with BESGs appears to have largely been driven by iCAST usage.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估分支血管(DB)桥接支架选择对复杂胸腹主动脉瘤腔内修复中靶动脉(TA)结局的影响。

方法

分析了 2005 年至 2020 年期间在美国进行的 9 项前瞻性医生赞助的器械豁免研究中的患者。所有至少有一条 TA 通过 DB 纳入的患者,包括使用自膨式(SESGs)、球囊扩张式(BESGs)或杂交支架移植物组合(HSGs)。终点是 TA 通畅性和免于 TA 内漏、不稳定和再干预。

结果

共有 800 例患者,2426 条肾肠系膜动脉通过 DB 纳入。DB 支架选择为 SESGs 的有 1205 条 TA(50%),BESGs 的有 1095 条 TA(45%),HSGs 的有 126 条 TA(5%)。SESGs 主要在前三个研究期使用,而 BESGs 在 2017 年至 2020 年期间占所有支架的 75%。中位随访时间为 15 个月(四分位距,6-35 个月)。5 年时,BESGs 的 TA 不稳定(78%±4%比 88%±1%比 96%±2%;对数秩 P=0.010)、TA 内漏(87%±3%比 97%±1%比 99%±1%;对数秩 P<0.001)和 TA 再干预(83%±4%比 95%±1%比 99%±2%;对数秩 P<0.001)的无事件率显著降低,分别与 SESGs 或 HSGs 相比。对于肾动脉,BESGs、SESGs 和 HSGs 之间在 TA 不稳定方面无差异。然而,与 SESGs 和 HSGs 相比,BESGs 靶肾动脉的 TA 内漏和再干预率较低(83%±6%比 98%±1%比 100%;对数秩 P<0.001;和 70%±10%比 92%±1%比 96%±4%;对数秩 P=0.022)。对于肠系膜动脉,BESGs 靶 DB 的 TA 不稳定、内漏和再干预率低于 SESGs 或 HSGs。在支架特异性分析中,iCAST BESGs 无论是肾动脉还是肠系膜动脉,TA 不稳定的无事件率均较低,主要是由于 TA 内漏率较高。任何情况下的通畅率均无差异。TA 不稳定的独立预测因素为年龄(每增加 1 岁:风险比 [HR],0.97;95%置信区间 [CI],0.94-0.99)、支架直径(每增加 1mm:HR,0.67;95% CI,0.57-0.80)和 BESG(HR,1.8;95% CI,1.1-2.9)。

结论

与 SESGs 和 HSGs 相比,使用 BESGs 构建的 DB 的 TA 不稳定、TA 内漏和 TA 再干预的无事件率较低。DB 的通畅率不受支架结构类型的影响。与 BESGs 相关的观察到的性能劣势似乎主要是由 iCAST 的使用造成的。

相似文献

1
Effect of bridging stent graft selection for directional branches on target artery outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair in the United States Aortic Research Consortium.美国主动脉研究联合会研究分支型腔内主动脉修复术中分支定向支架选择对靶动脉结局的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jul;78(1):10-28.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.03.025. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
2
Outcomes of directional branches using self-expandable or balloon-expandable stent grafts during endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.在胸腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术中使用自膨式或球囊扩张式支架移植物治疗定向分支的效果。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 May;71(5):1489-1502.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.07.079. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
3
Outcomes of balloon-expandable versus self-expandable stent graft for endovascular repair of iliac aneurysms using iliac branch endoprosthesis.使用髂支型血管内修复装置对髂动脉瘤进行血管内修复时,球囊扩张式与自膨式支架型人工血管的疗效比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 May;75(5):1616-1623.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.022. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
4
Mid-term Renal and Mesenteric Artery Outcomes During Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair for Complex Abdominal and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the United States Aortic Research Consortium.美国主动脉研究联合会:复杂胸腹主动脉瘤腔内分支和开窗血管修复术中期肾和肠系膜动脉转归。
Ann Surg. 2023 Oct 1;278(4):e893-e902. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005859. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
5
Impact of gap distance between fenestration and aortic wall on target artery instability following fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair.开窗与主动脉壁之间的间隙距离对开窗分支血管腔内修复术后靶动脉不稳定的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jul;76(1):79-87.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.01.135. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
6
Performance of Viabahn balloon-expandable stent compared with self-expandable covered stents for branched endovascular aortic repair.Viabahn球囊扩张式支架与自膨式覆膜支架在分支型血管腔内主动脉修复中的性能比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Feb;73(2):410-416.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.05.028. Epub 2020 May 27.
7
Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies Between Self- and Balloon-Expandable Bridging Stent Grafts in Branched Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.分支腔内动脉瘤修复中自膨式和球囊扩张式分支覆膜支架的对比研究的荟萃分析。
J Endovasc Ther. 2023 Jun;30(3):336-346. doi: 10.1177/15266028221083458. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
8
Outcomes of off-the-shelf multibranched stent grafts with intentional occlusion of directional branches using endovascular plugs during endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms.在复杂主动脉瘤血管腔内修复过程中,使用血管腔内封堵器对现成多分支支架型人工血管的定向分支进行有意封堵的效果。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Apr;75(4):1142-1150.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.09.050. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
9
Outcomes of endovascular repair of chronic postdissection compared with degenerative thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms using fenestrated-branched stent grafts.腔内修复慢性夹层后与使用开窗分支支架移植物的退行性胸腹主动脉瘤的结果比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Sep;72(3):822-836.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.091. Epub 2019 Dec 25.
10
Effect of aortic angulation on the outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair.主动脉成角对开窗-分支腔内修复术治疗效果的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Aug;74(2):372-382.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.01.027. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Hepatorenal bypass as a salvage strategy after occlusion following branched endovascular aortic repair.在分支型血管腔内主动脉修复术后闭塞后,肝肾旁路作为一种挽救策略。
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2025 Mar 5;11(3):101772. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2025.101772. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Endovascular Repair of Spontaneous Rupture of Stent Graft Branch in Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm-Management, Case Study, and Review.胸主动脉瘤覆膜支架分支自发破裂的血管腔内修复——管理、病例研究及综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 17;13(24):7687. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247687.
3
Comparison of Immediate, Medium, and Long-Term Postoperative Results of Open Surgery and Fenestrated/Branched Stent Grafts for Extended Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms.
开放手术与开窗/分支型覆膜支架治疗累及胸腹主动脉瘤的术后即刻、中期和长期结果比较
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 21;12(23):7207. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237207.