Division of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.
Division of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jun 20;878:162995. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162995. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
Pesticides constitute an integral part of today's agriculture. Their widespread use leads to ubiquitous contamination of the environment, including soils. Soils are a precious resource providing vital functions to society - thus, it is of utmost importance to thoroughly assess the risk posed by widespread pesticide contamination. The exposure of non-target organisms to pesticides in soils is challenging to quantify since only a fraction of the total pesticide concentration is bioavailable. Here we measured and compared the bioavailable and total concentrations of three fungicides - boscalid, azoxystrobin, and epoxiconazole - and evaluated which concentration best predicts effects on nine microbial markers. The experiments were performed in three different soils at five time points over two months employing nearly 900 microcosms with a model plant. The total and bioavailable concentrations of azoxystrobin and boscalid decreased steadily during the trial to levels of 25 % and 8 % of the original concentration, respectively, while the concentration of epoxiconazole in soil nearly remained unchanged. The bioavailable fraction generally showed a slightly faster and more pronounced decline. The microbial markers varied in their sensitivity to the three fungicides. Specific microbial markers, such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and bacterial and archaeal ammonia oxidizers, were most sensitive to each of the fungicide treatments, making them suitable indicators for pesticide effects. Even though the responses were predominantly negative, they were also transient, and the impact was no longer evident after two months. Finally, the bioavailable fraction did not better predict the relationships between exposure and effect than the total concentration. This study demonstrates that key microbial groups are temporarily susceptible to a single fungicide application, pointing to the risk that repeated use of pesticides may disrupt vital soil functions such as nutrient cycling in agroecosystems.
农药是当今农业的重要组成部分。它们的广泛使用导致了环境的普遍污染,包括土壤。土壤是一种宝贵的资源,为社会提供了重要的功能——因此,彻底评估广泛的农药污染所带来的风险至关重要。由于只有部分农药浓度是生物可利用的,因此非目标生物在土壤中接触农药的情况难以量化。在这里,我们测量并比较了三种杀菌剂——啶氧菌酯、唑菌胺酯和环唑醇——的生物可利用浓度和总浓度,并评估了哪种浓度最能预测它们对 9 个微生物标志物的影响。实验在三个月内的五个时间点,在三种不同的土壤中,使用近 900 个微宇宙和一种模式植物进行了 5 次试验。唑菌胺酯和啶氧菌酯的总浓度和生物可利用浓度在试验过程中持续下降,分别降至原始浓度的 25%和 8%,而土壤中环唑醇的浓度几乎保持不变。生物可利用部分通常表现出稍快且更明显的下降。微生物标志物对三种杀菌剂的敏感性不同。特定的微生物标志物,如丛枝菌根真菌以及细菌和古菌氨氧化菌,对每种杀菌剂处理都最为敏感,使它们成为农药效应的合适指标。尽管这些反应主要是负面的,但它们也是短暂的,两个月后就不再明显了。最后,生物可利用部分并不比总浓度更能预测暴露与效应之间的关系。这项研究表明,关键的微生物群体暂时容易受到单一杀菌剂的影响,这表明重复使用农药可能会破坏农业生态系统中养分循环等重要土壤功能的风险。