• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸肌筋膜平面阻滞与椎旁阻滞在微创二尖瓣手术镇痛中的比较。

Pectoral Fascial Plane Versus Paravertebral Blocks for Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery Analgesia.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2023 Jul;37(7):1188-1194. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.02.012. Epub 2023 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2023.02.012
PMID:36948910
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the postoperative analgesic efficacy of single-injection pectoral fascial plane (PECS) II blocks compared to paravertebral blocks for elective robotic mitral valve surgery.

DESIGN

A single-center retrospective study that reported patient and procedural characteristics, postoperative pain scores, and postoperative opioid use for patients undergoing robotic mitral valve surgery.

SETTING

This investigation was performed at a large quaternary referral center.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients (age ≥18) admitted to the authors' hospital from January 1, 2016, to August 14, 2020, for elective robotic mitral valve repair who received either a paravertebral or PECS II block for postoperative analgesia.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received an ultrasound-guided, unilateral paravertebral or PECS II nerve block.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

One hundred twenty-three patients received a PECS II block, and 190 patients received a paravertebral block during the study period. The primary outcome measures were average postoperative pain scores and cumulative opioid use. Secondary outcomes included hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay, need for reoperation, need for antiemetics, surgical wound infection, and atrial fibrillation incidence. Patients receiving the PECS II block required significantly fewer opioids in the immediate postoperative period than the paravertebral block group, and had comparable postoperative pain scores. No increase in adverse outcomes was noted for either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The PECS II block is a safe and highly effective option for regional analgesia for robotic mitral valve surgery, with demonstrated efficacy comparable to the paravertebral block.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了单次注射胸肌筋膜平面(PECS)II 阻滞与椎旁阻滞在择期机器人二尖瓣手术中的术后镇痛效果。

设计

这是一项单中心回顾性研究,报告了行机器人二尖瓣手术患者的患者和手术特征、术后疼痛评分和术后阿片类药物使用情况。

设置

该调查在一家大型四级转诊中心进行。

参与者

2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 8 月 14 日期间因择期机器人二尖瓣修复术入住作者医院的成年患者(年龄≥18 岁),接受单侧椎旁或 PECS II 阻滞用于术后镇痛。

干预措施

患者接受超声引导下的单侧椎旁或 PECS II 神经阻滞。

测量和主要结果

在研究期间,123 例患者接受了 PECS II 阻滞,190 例患者接受了椎旁阻滞。主要结局指标是平均术后疼痛评分和累积阿片类药物使用量。次要结局包括住院和重症监护病房的住院时间、再次手术的需要、止吐药的需要、手术部位感染和心房颤动的发生率。与椎旁阻滞组相比,接受 PECS II 阻滞的患者在术后即刻需要的阿片类药物明显较少,且术后疼痛评分相当。两组均未发现不良结局增加。

结论

PECS II 阻滞是机器人二尖瓣手术区域镇痛的一种安全且非常有效的选择,其疗效与椎旁阻滞相当。

相似文献

1
Pectoral Fascial Plane Versus Paravertebral Blocks for Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery Analgesia.胸肌筋膜平面阻滞与椎旁阻滞在微创二尖瓣手术镇痛中的比较。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2023 Jul;37(7):1188-1194. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.02.012. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
2
A Prospective Randomized Study of Paravertebral Blockade in Patients Undergoing Robotic Mitral Valve Repair.一项关于机器人辅助二尖瓣修复手术患者椎旁阻滞的前瞻性随机研究。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 Aug;29(4):930-6. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.10.010. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
3
Bilateral PECS II Block is Associated with Decreased Opioid Consumption and Reduced Pain Scores for up to 24 hours After Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum (Nuss Procedure): A Retrospective Analysis.双侧胸大肌间沟阻滞与微创漏斗胸矫正术(Nuss 手术)后 24 小时内阿片类药物消耗减少和疼痛评分降低相关:一项回顾性分析。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Oct;36(10):3833-3840. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.06.001. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
4
Postoperative pain treatment with erector spinae plane block and pectoralis nerve blocks in patients undergoing mitral/tricuspid valve repair - a randomized controlled trial.接受二尖瓣/三尖瓣修复手术的患者中竖脊肌平面阻滞和胸神经阻滞用于术后疼痛治疗的随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Feb 27;20(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-00961-8.
5
Efficacy of pectoral nerve block type II versus thoracic paravertebral block for analgesia in breast cancer surgery.Ⅱ型胸神经阻滞与胸椎旁神经阻滞用于乳腺癌手术镇痛的效果比较。
Klin Onkol. 2020 Summer;33(4):296-301. doi: 10.14735/amko2020296.
6
Deep Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Sternotomy for Cardiac Surgery-A Retrospective Cohort Study.心脏手术胸骨切开术后镇痛的胸骨旁肋间深层平面阻滞——一项回顾性队列研究
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2024 Jan;38(1):189-196. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.09.044. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
7
Efficacy of pectoral nerve block versus thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after radical mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial.胸大肌神经阻滞与胸椎旁神经阻滞在乳腺癌根治术后镇痛效果的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;117(3):382-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew223.
8
Pectoral Fascial (PECS) I and II Blocks as Rescue Analgesia in a Patient Undergoing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery.胸肌筋膜(PECS)I 和 II 阻滞作为微创心脏手术患者的解救镇痛。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Nov/Dec;42(6):764-766. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000661.
9
Analgesic Benefit of Pectoral Nerve Block II Blockade for Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis: A Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blinded, Controlled Trial.经胸大肌Ⅱ型神经阻滞对开放性肱二头肌长头腱固定术的镇痛效果:一项随机、前瞻性、双盲、对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Aug;129(2):536-542. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004233.
10
Analgesic efficacy of the Pecs II block: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pecs II 阻滞的镇痛效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Anaesthesia. 2019 May;74(5):663-673. doi: 10.1111/anae.14607.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing Analgesia After Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial Comparing Interpectoral Plane Block Plus Serratus Anterior Plane Block to Erector Spinae Plane Block.微创心脏手术后镇痛的优化:一项比较胸肌间平面阻滞联合前锯肌平面阻滞与竖脊肌平面阻滞的随机非劣效性试验。
J Clin Med. 2025 May 28;14(11):3786. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113786.
2
Pain Management in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Review of Current Clinical Evidence.微创心脏手术中的疼痛管理:当前临床证据综述
Pain Ther. 2025 Jun;14(3):913-930. doi: 10.1007/s40122-025-00739-1. Epub 2025 Apr 24.