Blank Valentin, Heni Maria, Karlas Thomas
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine II, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Gastroenterology and Division of Interdisciplinary Ultrasound, University Hospital Halle, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Ultrasound Int Open. 2023 Mar 20;9(1):E2-E10. doi: 10.1055/a-1999-7818. eCollection 2023 Jan.
Blood flow dynamics represent a diagnostic criterion for many diseases. However, no established reference standard is available. In clinical practice, ultrasound pulsed-wave Doppler (PW-Doppler) is frequently used to assess visceral blood flow, despite its well-known limitations. A quantitative analysis of conventional color Doppler patterns can be performed using an innovative ultrasound-based algorithm (pixel flow analysis, PFA). This tool already shows promising results in obstetrics, but the technique has not yet been evaluated for portal venous blood flow assessment. This prospective exploratory research study evaluated the applicability of PFA in the portal venous system. Measurements of portal venous flow using PFA and PW-Doppler were compared in healthy volunteers (n=20) and in patients with hepatic steatosis (n=10) and liver cirrhosis (n=10). In healthy volunteers (60% female, mean age 23 years, BMI 21.5 kg/m [20.4-23.8]), PFA and PW-Doppler showed a strong positive correlation in fasting conditions (r=0.69; 95% CI 0.36-0.87), recording a median blood flow of 834 ml/min (624-1066) and 718 ml/min (620-811), respectively. PFA was also applicable in patients with chronic liver diseases (55% female, age 65 years (55-72); BMI 27.8 kg/m (25.4-30.8)), but the correlation between PFA and PW-Doppler was poor (r=- 0.09) in the subgroup with steatosis. A better correlation (r=0.61) was observed in patients with liver cirrhosis. PFA and PW-Doppler assessment of portal venous vascularization showed high agreement in healthy volunteers and patients with liver cirrhosis. Therefore, PFA represents a possible alternative to conventional PW-Doppler sonography for visceral blood flow diagnostics and merits further evaluation.
血流动力学是许多疾病的诊断标准。然而,目前尚无既定的参考标准。在临床实践中,尽管超声脉冲波多普勒(PW-多普勒)存在众所周知的局限性,但仍经常用于评估内脏血流。可以使用基于超声的创新算法(像素流分析,PFA)对传统彩色多普勒模式进行定量分析。该工具在产科已经显示出有前景的结果,但该技术尚未用于门静脉血流评估。这项前瞻性探索性研究评估了PFA在门静脉系统中的适用性。在健康志愿者(n=20)、肝脂肪变性患者(n=10)和肝硬化患者(n=10)中比较了使用PFA和PW-多普勒测量门静脉血流的情况。在健康志愿者(60%为女性,平均年龄23岁,BMI为21.5kg/m²[20.4-23.8])中,PFA和PW-多普勒在空腹条件下显示出强正相关(r=0.69;95%CI为0.36-0.87),分别记录到中位数血流为834ml/min(624-1066)和718ml/min(620-811)。PFA也适用于慢性肝病患者(55%为女性,年龄65岁[55-72];BMI为27.8kg/m²[25.4-30.8]),但在脂肪变性亚组中,PFA与PW-多普勒之间的相关性较差(r=-0.09)。在肝硬化患者中观察到更好的相关性(r=0.61)。PFA和PW-多普勒对门静脉血管化的评估在健康志愿者和肝硬化患者中显示出高度一致性。因此,PFA是内脏血流诊断中传统PW-多普勒超声检查的一种可能替代方法,值得进一步评估。