Mortezaee Keywan, Majidpoor Jamal
Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.
Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Infectious Diseases Research Center, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 13;9(3):e14566. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14566. eCollection 2023 Mar.
This review discusses the impact of mono or combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, comparing clinical outcomes and safety. Cancer subtype, tumor mutational burden (TMB), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression state and T cell infiltration (TIL) density are considered for interpretations. Besides, current progresses in the field of immunotherapy are discussed.
Anti-PD-(L)1 is a safe and an effective strategy in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC. Clinical responses to nivolumab and pembrolizumab, in particular, are promising. The most desired clinical responses are for patients receiving combination of anti-PD-(L)1 or anti-PD-(L)1/anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) with chemotherapy (taxane and platinum). PD-L1 expression state (PD-L1 50%), patient performance state (PS: 0-1 ECOG scale) and effector T cell (Teff) immune signature considerably affect ICI responses. Higher ICI responses are also expected in TMB but EGFR/ALK cancer patients. In regard with safety profile, adverse events (AEs) related to anti-PD-(L)1 are lower compared with that for platinum-based and docetaxel therapy. Toripalimab is the safest among various immunotherapy drugs. Bispecific antibodies against anti-PD-(L)1 with dominant signaling or alternative checkpoints in tumor microenvironment (TME) is the current focus in immunotherapy of cancers like NSCLC. Besides, the contribution of extracellular vesicles (EVs) to immune escape and their implication in cancer diagnosis and therapy is on the eye of current investigations.
Appropriate biomarker selection will improve therapy outcomes in ICI treated NSCLC patients, particularly in cases under combinatory ICI therapy. Application of bispecific antibodies and EV-based targeted therapy are effective novel strategies to improve therapeutic outcomes in cancer patients.
本综述探讨免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)单药或联合治疗对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的影响,比较临床疗效和安全性。解读时考虑了癌症亚型、肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)、程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达状态和T细胞浸润(TIL)密度。此外,还讨论了免疫治疗领域的当前进展。
抗PD-(L)1对晚期/转移性NSCLC患者是一种安全有效的策略。特别是纳武利尤单抗和帕博利珠单抗的临床反应很有前景。最理想的临床反应是接受抗PD-(L)1或抗PD-(L)1/抗细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关抗原4(CTLA-4)与化疗(紫杉烷和铂类)联合治疗的患者。PD-L1表达状态(PD-L1≥50%)、患者体能状态(PS:东部肿瘤协作组体能状态评分0-1分)和效应T细胞(Teff)免疫特征对ICI反应有显著影响。TMB高但无表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)/间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)突变的癌症患者也有望获得更高的ICI反应。在安全性方面,与铂类和多西他赛治疗相比,抗PD-(L)1相关的不良事件(AE)较少。在各种免疫治疗药物中,托瑞帕利单抗是最安全的。在肿瘤微环境(TME)中针对抗PD-(L)1的双特异性抗体,具有主导信号或替代检查点,是目前NSCLC等癌症免疫治疗的重点。此外,细胞外囊泡(EV)对免疫逃逸的作用及其在癌症诊断和治疗中的意义是当前研究的热点。
选择合适的生物标志物将改善接受ICI治疗的NSCLC患者的治疗效果,尤其是在联合ICI治疗的情况下。双特异性抗体和基于EV的靶向治疗的应用是提高癌症患者治疗效果的有效新策略。